[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAK8P3a3gGKyTGPRh=VyJ8SZq-VXk-5ZFNu-WwssZmWVucy4bCQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:02:29 +0100
From: Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To: Andy Shevchenko <andy.shevchenko@...il.com>
Cc: Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Krzysztof Adamski <krzysztof.adamski@...ia.com>,
Oleksij Rempel <o.rempel@...gutronix.de>,
Baruch Siach <baruch@...s.co.il>,
Russell King - ARM Linux <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Daniel Tang <dt.tangr@...il.com>,
Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>, Jamie Iles <jamie@...ieiles.com>,
Barry Song <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Jonas Jensen <jonas.jensen@...il.com>,
Marc Gonzalez <marc.w.gonzalez@...e.fr>,
Hartley Sweeten <hsweeten@...ionengravers.com>,
Lubomir Rintel <lkundrak@...sk>,
Neil Armstrong <narmstrong@...libre.com>,
Shawn Guo <shawnguo@...nel.org>, Alex Elder <elder@...aro.org>,
Alexander Shiyan <shc_work@...l.ru>,
Koen Vandeputte <koen.vandeputte@...ntric.com>,
Hans Ulli Kroll <ulli.kroll@...glemail.com>,
Vladimir Zapolskiy <vz@...ia.com>,
Wei Xu <xuwei5@...ilicon.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Yoshinori Sato <ysato@...rs.sourceforge.jp>,
Mark Salter <msalter@...hat.com>,
Michael Ellerman <mpe@...erman.id.au>,
Geert Uytterhoeven <geert+renesas@...der.be>,
Thomas Bogendoerfer <tsbogend@...ha.franken.de>
Subject: Re: Old platforms: bring out your dead
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 11:31 AM Andy Shevchenko
<andy.shevchenko@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Sat, Jan 9, 2021 at 12:58 AM Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > After v5.10 was officially declared an LTS kernel,
>
> I have a question here. Maybe I have missed something, but how LTS
> helps in this case? LTS AFAIR has a rule "upstream first". How can you
> provide a patch to be backported if there is no upstream for it
> anymore?
Platform specific bugs are usually not the problem here, and if something
does happen on deleted code, I would expect you can get an exception
to the "upstream first" rule.
What I was getting at here were the things in the second category, the
stuff that is is still maintained and working, but so old that it becomes a
burden for maintainers. If a maintainer knows who all the users are
and what they do with their machines, removing the platform from mainline
would be a chance to get everyone to use the same LTS version so they
can get bugfixes to common kernel code for a few more years and
benefit from everyone else testing the same codebase.
> > * 80486SX/DX: 80386 CPUs were dropped in 2012, and there are
> > indications that 486 have no users either on recent kernels.
> > There is still the Vortex86 family of SoCs, and the oldest of those were
> > 486SX-class, but all the modern ones are 586-class.
> > * Alpha 2106x: First generation that lacks some of the later features.
> > Since all Alphas are ancient by now, it's hard to tell whether these have
> > any fewer users.
>
> We still have Intel Quark available. I run vanilla from time to time
> on it due to the presence of peripherals I can't find elsewhere on x86
> boards.
While Quark is derived from a i486 pipeline, the kernel treats it as
CONFIG_M586TSC, as it contains fpu, rdtsc, cpuid and cmpxchg8b
instructions but no cmov or mmx. More importantly, you wouldn't find the
vintage i486 peripherals (drivers/ide, drivers/video/fbdev, VLB, ISA,
floppy) but instead have modern stuff like USB, PCIe, and eMMC.
Arnd
Powered by blists - more mailing lists