[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210113114250.GH11878@paasikivi.fi.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:42:50 +0200
From: Sakari Ailus <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>
To: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>
Cc: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
ACPI Devel Maling List <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:ACPI COMPONENT ARCHITECTURE (ACPICA)" <devel@...ica.org>,
"Rafael J. Wysocki" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
Len Brown <lenb@...nel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
yong.zhi@...el.com, Bingbu Cao <bingbu.cao@...el.com>,
tian.shu.qiu@...el.com, Robert Moore <robert.moore@...el.com>,
Erik Kaneda <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Andy Shevchenko <andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>,
Rasmus Villemoes <linux@...musvillemoes.dk>,
Laurent Pinchart <laurent.pinchart+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
Jacopo Mondi <jacopo+renesas@...ndi.org>,
Kieran Bingham <kieran.bingham+renesas@...asonboard.com>,
hverkuil-cisco@...all.nl, m.felsch@...gutronix.de,
Niklas Soderlund <niklas.soderlund+renesas@...natech.se>,
prabhakar.mahadev-lad.rj@...renesas.com,
Steve Longerbeam <slongerbeam@...il.com>,
Heikki Krogerus <heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 00/15] Add functionality to ipu3-cio2 driver allowing
software_node connections to sensors on platforms designed for Windows
Hi Daniel,
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 11:35:37PM +0000, Daniel Scally wrote:
> Hi Rafael, Sakari
>
> On 12/01/2021 19:34, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote:
> > <snip>
> >> I'm hopeful that most or all of this series could get picked up for 5.12.
> >> We touch a few different areas (listed below), but I think the easiest
> >> approach would be to merge everything through media tree. Rafael, Greg,
> >> Mauro and Sergey; are you ok with that plan, or would you prefer a
> >> different approach? Mauro; if that plan is ok (and of course assuming that
> >> the rest of the patches are acked by their respective maintainers) could
> >> we get a dedicated feature branch just in case the following series ends
> >> up being ready in time too?
> >>
> >> <snip>
> > Please feel free to add
> >
> > Acked-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>
> >
> > to all of the device properties patches in this series if that helps.
> >
> > Thanks!
>
> Thanks very much (and Greg too).
>
>
> Sakari; unless I'm misunderstanding something, I think this series could
> be picked up now, right? Would it be ok to do that through your tree? I
> think the idea of a dedicated feature branch can be dropped, I won't
> have the second series ready in time for this round anyway.
>
>
> First time doing this, so if I've missed something please let me know!
I think it's ready, indeed. I'll let you know if there are any issues.
--
Kind regards,
Sakari Ailus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists