linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 06/77] scsi: scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210113114745.GA2843@duo.ucw.cz>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 12:47:45 +0100
From:   Pavel Machek <pavel@....cz>
To:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...r.kernel.org,
        Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
        James Bottomley <James.Bottomley@...senPartnership.com>,
        Woody Suwalski <terraluna977@...il.com>,
        Can Guo <cang@...eaurora.org>,
        Stanley Chu <stanley.chu@...iatek.com>,
        Ming Lei <ming.lei@...hat.com>,
        "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com>,
        Stan Johnson <userm57@...oo.com>,
        Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Hannes Reinecke <hare@...e.de>,
        Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>,
        "Martin K. Petersen" <martin.petersen@...cle.com>,
        Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 06/77] scsi: scsi_transport_spi: Set RQF_PM for
 domain validation commands

Hi!

> From: Bart Van Assche <bvanassche@....org>
> 
> [ Upstream commit cfefd9f8240a7b9fdd96fcd54cb029870b6d8d88 ]
> 
> Disable runtime power management during domain validation. Since a later
> patch removes RQF_PREEMPT, set RQF_PM for domain validation commands such
> that these are executed in the quiesced SCSI device state.

This and "05/77] scsi: ide: Do not set the RQF_PREEMPT flag for" do
not fix anything AFAICT. They are in series with other patches in
5.10, so they may make sense there, but I don't think we need them in
4.19.

Best regards,
								Pavel


> index 69213842e63e0..efb9c3d902133 100644
> --- a/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c
> +++ b/drivers/scsi/scsi_transport_spi.c
> @@ -130,12 +130,16 @@ static int spi_execute(struct scsi_device *sdev, const void *cmd,
>  		sshdr = &sshdr_tmp;
>  
>  	for(i = 0; i < DV_RETRIES; i++) {
> +		/*
> +		 * The purpose of the RQF_PM flag below is to bypass the
> +		 * SDEV_QUIESCE state.
> +		 */
>  		result = scsi_execute(sdev, cmd, dir, buffer, bufflen, sense,
>  				      sshdr, DV_TIMEOUT, /* retries */ 1,
>  				      REQ_FAILFAST_DEV |
>  				      REQ_FAILFAST_TRANSPORT |
>  				      REQ_FAILFAST_DRIVER,
> -				      0, NULL);
> +				      RQF_PM, NULL);
>  		if (driver_byte(result) != DRIVER_SENSE ||
>  		    sshdr->sense_key != UNIT_ATTENTION)
>  			break;
> @@ -1018,23 +1022,26 @@ spi_dv_device(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>  	 */
>  	lock_system_sleep();
>  
> +	if (scsi_autopm_get_device(sdev))
> +		goto unlock_system_sleep;
> +
>  	if (unlikely(spi_dv_in_progress(starget)))
> -		goto unlock;
> +		goto put_autopm;
>  
>  	if (unlikely(scsi_device_get(sdev)))
> -		goto unlock;
> +		goto put_autopm;
>  
>  	spi_dv_in_progress(starget) = 1;
>  
>  	buffer = kzalloc(len, GFP_KERNEL);
>  
>  	if (unlikely(!buffer))
> -		goto out_put;
> +		goto put_sdev;
>  
>  	/* We need to verify that the actual device will quiesce; the
>  	 * later target quiesce is just a nice to have */
>  	if (unlikely(scsi_device_quiesce(sdev)))
> -		goto out_free;
> +		goto free_buffer;
>  
>  	scsi_target_quiesce(starget);
>  
> @@ -1054,12 +1061,16 @@ spi_dv_device(struct scsi_device *sdev)
>  
>  	spi_initial_dv(starget) = 1;
>  
> - out_free:
> +free_buffer:
>  	kfree(buffer);
> - out_put:
> +
> +put_sdev:
>  	spi_dv_in_progress(starget) = 0;
>  	scsi_device_put(sdev);
> -unlock:
> +put_autopm:
> +	scsi_autopm_put_device(sdev);
> +
> +unlock_system_sleep:
>  	unlock_system_sleep();
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(spi_dv_device);
> -- 
> 2.27.0
> 
> 

-- 
http://www.livejournal.com/~pavelmachek

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (196 bytes)