[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210113124847.GC1383@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 13:48:47 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Claire Chang <tientzu@...omium.org>
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, mpe@...erman.id.au, benh@...nel.crashing.org,
paulus@...ba.org, joro@...tes.org, will@...nel.org,
frowand.list@...il.com, konrad.wilk@...cle.com,
boris.ostrovsky@...cle.com, jgross@...e.com,
sstabellini@...nel.org, hch@....de, m.szyprowski@...sung.com,
robin.murphy@....com, grant.likely@....com, xypron.glpk@....de,
treding@...dia.com, mingo@...nel.org, bauerman@...ux.ibm.com,
peterz@...radead.org, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org,
saravanak@...gle.com, rafael.j.wysocki@...el.com,
heikki.krogerus@...ux.intel.com, andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com,
rdunlap@...radead.org, dan.j.williams@...el.com,
bgolaszewski@...libre.com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org,
iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org, xen-devel@...ts.xenproject.org,
tfiga@...omium.org, drinkcat@...omium.org
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 4/6] swiotlb: Add restricted DMA alloc/free
support.
> +#ifdef CONFIG_SWIOTLB
> + if (unlikely(dev->dma_io_tlb_mem))
> + return swiotlb_alloc(dev, size, dma_handle, attrs);
> +#endif
Another place where the dma_io_tlb_mem is useful to avoid the ifdef.
> -phys_addr_t swiotlb_tbl_map_single(struct device *hwdev, phys_addr_t orig_addr,
> - size_t mapping_size, size_t alloc_size,
> - enum dma_data_direction dir, unsigned long attrs)
> +static int swiotlb_tbl_find_free_region(struct device *hwdev,
> + dma_addr_t tbl_dma_addr,
> + size_t alloc_size,
> + unsigned long attrs)
> +static void swiotlb_tbl_release_region(struct device *hwdev, int index,
> + size_t size)
This refactoring should be another prep patch.
> +void *swiotlb_alloc(struct device *dev, size_t size, dma_addr_t *dma_handle,
> + unsigned long attrs)
I'd rather have the names convey there are for the per-device bounce
buffer in some form.
> + struct io_tlb_mem *mem = dev->dma_io_tlb_mem;
While we're at it I wonder if the io_tlb is something we could change
while we're at it. Maybe replace io_tlb_mem with struct swiotlb
and rename the field in struct device to dev_swiotlb?
> + int index;
> + void *vaddr;
> + phys_addr_t tlb_addr;
> +
> + size = PAGE_ALIGN(size);
> + index = swiotlb_tbl_find_free_region(dev, mem->start, size, attrs);
> + if (index < 0)
> + return NULL;
> +
> + tlb_addr = mem->start + (index << IO_TLB_SHIFT);
> + *dma_handle = phys_to_dma_unencrypted(dev, tlb_addr);
> +
> + if (!dev_is_dma_coherent(dev)) {
> + unsigned long pfn = PFN_DOWN(tlb_addr);
> +
> + /* remove any dirty cache lines on the kernel alias */
> + arch_dma_prep_coherent(pfn_to_page(pfn), size);
Can we hook in somewhat lower level in the dma-direct code so that all
the remapping in dma-direct can be reused instead of duplicated? That
also becomes important if we want to use non-remapping uncached support,
e.g. on mips or x86, or the direct changing of the attributes that Will
planned to look into for arm64.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists