linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iommu: add bindings for sprd iommu

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAL_JsqKqi_tngaR0nHpjbQz2Q8QnwJ+Ea=DghT6xqR9U8o-5CQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 07:47:26 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org>
To:     Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
Cc:     Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
        Linux IOMMU <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        DTML <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        Baolin Wang <baolin.wang7@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Orson Zhai <orsonzhai@...il.com>,
        Sheng Xu <sheng.xu@...soc.com>,
        Kevin Tang <kevin.tang@...soc.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 1/2] dt-bindings: iommu: add bindings for sprd iommu

On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 5:34 AM Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com> wrote:
>
> On Fri, 8 Jan 2021 at 10:25, Rob Herring <robh@...nel.org> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Dec 23, 2020 at 07:16:32PM +0800, Chunyan Zhang wrote:
> > > From: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> > >
> > > This patch only adds bindings to support display iommu, support for others
> > > would be added once finished tests with those devices, such as Image
> > > codec(jpeg) processor, a few signal processors, including VSP(video),
> > > GSP(graphic), ISP(image), and camera CPP, etc.
> > >
> > > Signed-off-by: Chunyan Zhang <chunyan.zhang@...soc.com>
> > > ---
> > >  .../devicetree/bindings/iommu/sprd,iommu.yaml | 44 +++++++++++++++++++
> > >  1 file changed, 44 insertions(+)
> > >  create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/sprd,iommu.yaml
> > >
> > > diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/sprd,iommu.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/sprd,iommu.yaml
> > > new file mode 100644
> > > index 000000000000..4d9a578a7cc9
> > > --- /dev/null
> > > +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/sprd,iommu.yaml
> > > @@ -0,0 +1,44 @@
> > > +# SPDX-License-Identifier: (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause)
> > > +# Copyright 2020 Unisoc Inc.
> > > +%YAML 1.2
> > > +---
> > > +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/iommu/sprd,iommu.yaml#
> > > +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> > > +
> > > +title: Unisoc IOMMU and Multi-media MMU
> > > +
> > > +maintainers:
> > > +  - Chunyan Zhang <zhang.lyra@...il.com>
> > > +
> > > +properties:
> > > +  compatible:
> > > +    enum:
> > > +      - sprd,iommu-disp
> >
> > Needs to be Soc specific.
>
> All SoCs so far use the same iommu IP, there's a little different
> among different iommu users.

That's what everyone says. Be warned that you cannot add properties
for any differences that come up whether features or errata.

> > Is this block specific to display subsys or
> > that just happens to be where the instance is?
>
> This iommu driver can serve many subsystem devices, such as Video,
> Camera, Image, etc., but they have their own iommu module which looks
> like a subdevice embedded in the master devices.
> I will add more compatible strings for those devices when needed.
> For now, only this one was listed here because I just tested this
> iommu driver with DPU only.

The iommu binding takes care of what each one is connected to. Is each
instance different in terms of features or programming model? If not,
then you shouldn't have different compatible strings for each
instance.

Rob