Date:   Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:09:04 +0000
From:   Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
To:     Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>,
        Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
CC:     Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@...wei.com>,
        "alex.williamson@...hat.com" <alex.williamson@...hat.com>,
        wangxingang <wangxingang5@...wei.com>,
        "kvm@...r.kernel.org" <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
        "maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "vivek.gautam@....com" <vivek.gautam@....com>,
        "iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org" <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        qubingbing <qubingbing@...ilicon.com>,
        "Zengtao (B)" <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>,
        "zhangfei.gao@...aro.org" <zhangfei.gao@...aro.org>,
        "eric.auger.pro@...il.com" <eric.auger.pro@...il.com>,
        "will@...nel.org" <will@...nel.org>,
        "kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu" <kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>,
        "robin.murphy@....com" <robin.murphy@....com>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with
 unmanaged ASIDs

Hi Eric,

> -----Original Message-----
> From: Auger Eric [mailto:eric.auger@...hat.com]
> Sent: 14 January 2021 16:58
> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>;
> Jean-Philippe Brucker <jean-philippe@...aro.org>
> Cc: Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@...wei.com>; alex.williamson@...hat.com;
> wangxingang <wangxingang5@...wei.com>; kvm@...r.kernel.org;
> maz@...nel.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org; vivek.gautam@....com;
> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org; qubingbing <qubingbing@...ilicon.com>;
> Zengtao (B) <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>; zhangfei.gao@...aro.org;
> eric.auger.pro@...il.com; will@...nel.org; kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu;
> robin.murphy@....com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation with
> unmanaged ASIDs
> 
> Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe,
> 
> On 12/4/20 11:23 AM, Auger Eric wrote:
> > Hi Shameer, Jean-Philippe,
> >
> > On 12/4/20 11:20 AM, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi wrote:
> >> Hi Jean,
> >>
> >>> -----Original Message-----
> >>> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker [mailto:jean-philippe@...aro.org]
> >>> Sent: 04 December 2020 09:54
> >>> To: Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> <shameerali.kolothum.thodi@...wei.com>
> >>> Cc: Auger Eric <eric.auger@...hat.com>; wangxingang
> >>> <wangxingang5@...wei.com>; Xieyingtai <xieyingtai@...wei.com>;
> >>> kvm@...r.kernel.org; maz@...nel.org; joro@...tes.org;
> will@...nel.org;
> >>> iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org; linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org;
> >>> vivek.gautam@....com; alex.williamson@...hat.com;
> >>> zhangfei.gao@...aro.org; robin.murphy@....com;
> >>> kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu; eric.auger.pro@...il.com; Zengtao (B)
> >>> <prime.zeng@...ilicon.com>; qubingbing <qubingbing@...ilicon.com>
> >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v13 07/15] iommu/smmuv3: Allow stage 1 invalidation
> with
> >>> unmanaged ASIDs
> >>>
> >>> Hi Shameer,
> >>>
> >>> On Thu, Dec 03, 2020 at 06:42:57PM +0000, Shameerali Kolothum Thodi
> wrote:
> >>>> Hi Jean/zhangfei,
> >>>> Is it possible to have a branch with minimum required SVA/UACCE related
> >>> patches
> >>>> that are already public and can be a "stable" candidate for future respin
> of
> >>> Eric's series?
> >>>> Please share your thoughts.
> >>>
> >>> By "stable" you mean a fixed branch with the latest SVA/UACCE patches
> >>> based on mainline?
> >>
> >> Yes.
> >>
> >>  The uacce-devel branches from
> >>> https://github.com/Linaro/linux-kernel-uadk do provide this at the moment
> >>> (they track the latest sva/zip-devel branch
> >>> https://jpbrucker.net/git/linux/ which is roughly based on mainline.)
> As I plan to respin shortly, please could you confirm the best branch to
> rebase on still is that one (uacce-devel from the linux-kernel-uadk git
> repo). Is it up to date? Commits seem to be quite old there.

I think it is the uacce-devel-5.11 branch, but will wait for Jean or Zhangfei
to confirm.

Thanks,
Shameer

> Thanks
> 
> Eric
> >>
> >> Thanks.
> >>
> >> Hi Eric,
> >>
> >> Could you please take a look at the above branches and see whether it make
> sense
> >> to rebase on top of either of those?
> >>
> >> From vSVA point of view, it will be less rebase hassle if we can do that.
> >
> > Sure. I will rebase on top of this ;-)
> >
> > Thanks
> >
> > Eric
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >> Shameer
> >>
> >>> Thanks,
> >>> Jean
> >>
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > iommu mailing list
> > iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org
> > https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
> >

Powered by blists - more mailing lists