linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] Documentation/llvm: Add a section about supported architectures

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CAKwvOdmHsO-yqUuCFouy4jhDwLaL-5+K8JkJ0Jo5Q_UQEF_2rg@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jan 2021 09:53:34 -0800
From:   Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>
To:     Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Cc:     Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>,
        Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Miguel Ojeda <ojeda@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] Documentation/llvm: Add a section about supported architectures

On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 6:36 AM Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 17:19:59 -0800
> Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> > Patch looks fine, but `make -j htmldocs` seems to be taking forever
> > for me so I can't render it. Is this a known issue?
> >
> > $ make -j htmldocs
> >   SPHINX  htmldocs --> file:///android0/linux-next/Documentation/output
> > make[2]: Nothing to be done for 'html'.
> > WARNING: The kernel documentation build process
> >         support for Sphinx v3.0 and above is brand new. Be prepared for
> >         possible issues in the generated output.
>
> Sphinx 3.x is *way* slower to build the docs, alas.  One of many
> "improvements" we got with that change.

Oh, man, yeah. Noticeably.  I had sworn I had run `make htmldocs`
before.  Have you had a chance to report this regression upstream?
-- 
Thanks,
~Nick Desaulniers