[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210114031839.GA415540@carbon.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:18:39 -0800
From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com>
To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com>
CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>,
Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lkp@...ts.01.org>,
<lkp@...el.com>, <ying.huang@...el.com>, <feng.tang@...el.com>,
<zhengjun.xing@...el.com>
Subject: Re: [mm] 10befea91b: hackbench.throughput -62.4% regression
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:51:51AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote:
>
> Greeting,
>
> FYI, we noticed a -62.4% regression of hackbench.throughput due to commit:
Hi!
Commit "mm: memcg/slab: optimize objcg stock draining" (currently only in the mm tree,
so no stable hash) should improve the hackbench regression.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists