lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening PHC | |
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 19:18:39 -0800 From: Roman Gushchin <guro@...com> To: kernel test robot <oliver.sang@...el.com> CC: Johannes Weiner <hannes@...xchg.org>, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>, Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>, Christoph Lameter <cl@...ux.com>, Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>, Tejun Heo <tj@...nel.org>, Naresh Kamboju <naresh.kamboju@...aro.org>, Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <lkp@...ts.01.org>, <lkp@...el.com>, <ying.huang@...el.com>, <feng.tang@...el.com>, <zhengjun.xing@...el.com> Subject: Re: [mm] 10befea91b: hackbench.throughput -62.4% regression On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:51:51AM +0800, kernel test robot wrote: > > Greeting, > > FYI, we noticed a -62.4% regression of hackbench.throughput due to commit: Hi! Commit "mm: memcg/slab: optimize objcg stock draining" (currently only in the mm tree, so no stable hash) should improve the hackbench regression. Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists