lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <X/++OfdtJSykRIeB@mit.edu>
Date:   Wed, 13 Jan 2021 22:44:57 -0500
From:   "Theodore Ts'o" <tytso@....edu>
To:     Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>
Cc:     "adilger.kernel@...ger.ca" <adilger.kernel@...ger.ca>,
        "harshadshirwadkar@...il.com" <harshadshirwadkar@...il.com>,
        "linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org" <linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] ext4: Remove expensive flush on fast commit

On Wed, Jan 06, 2021 at 10:32:42AM +0900, Daejun Park wrote:
> In the fast commit, it adds REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH on each fast commit
> block when barrier is enabled. However, in recovery phase, ext4 compares
> CRC value in the tail. So it is sufficient adds REQ_FUA and REQ_PREFLUSH
> on the block that has tail.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Daejun Park <daejun7.park@...sung.com>

Thanks, applied.

					- Ted

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ