linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/3] usb: dwc2: Fixes and improvements

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <9a8d9a57a1837fb7e0b17f19f089c55f955c98fc.camel@suse.de>
Date:   Thu, 14 Jan 2021 10:26:25 +0100
From:   Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>,
        Doug Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Cc:     Paul Zimmerman <Paul.Zimmerman@...opsys.com>,
        Felipe Balbi <balbi@...com>,
        Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        Nick Hudson <skrll@...bsd.org>,
        Linux USB List <linux-usb@...r.kernel.org>,
        Minas Harutyunyan <hminas@...opsys.com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/3] usb: dwc2: Fixes and improvements

Hi Guenter, Doug, thanks for having a look at this.

On Wed, 2021-01-13 at 19:07 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 03:20:55PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote:
> > Hi,
> > 
> [ ... ]
> > 
> > It's been long enough ago that I've forgotten where this was left off,
> > but IIRC the 3 patches that you have here are all fine to land (and
> > have my Reviewed-by tag).  However, I think Guenter was still tracking
> > down additional problems.  Guenter: does that match your recollection?
> > 
> > It looks like there are still bugs open for this on our public bug tracker:
> > 
> > https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/172208170
> > https://issuetracker.google.com/issues/172216241
> > 
> > ...but, as Guenter said, I don't think there's anyone actively working on them.
> > 
> > I'm not really doing too much with dwc2 these days either and don't
> > currently have good HW setup for testing, so for the most part I'll
> > leave it to you.  I wanted to at least summarize what I remembered,
> > though!  :-)
> > 
> 
> The patches in this series still match what I had in my latest test code,
> so it makes sense to move forward with them. I don't think I ever found
> an acceptable version of the DMA alignment code.

As for the alignment code rework, can you recall the underlying issue that
warranted it?

Regards,
Nicolas


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)