[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210113155023.1f52ee4f@kicinski-fedora-pc1c0hjn.dhcp.thefacebook.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Jan 2021 15:50:23 -0800
From: Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
To: Sebastien Laveze <sebastien.laveze@....nxp.com>
Cc: Giuseppe Cavallaro <peppe.cavallaro@...com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Jose Abreu <joabreu@...opsys.com>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rt-users@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net] net: stmmac: use __napi_schedule() for PREEMPT_RT
On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 15:01:22 +0100 Sebastien Laveze wrote:
> From: Seb Laveze <sebastien.laveze@....com>
>
> Use of __napi_schedule_irqoff() is not safe with PREEMPT_RT in which
> hard interrupts are not disabled while running the threaded interrupt.
>
> Using __napi_schedule() works for both PREEMPT_RT and mainline Linux,
> just at the cost of an additional check if interrupts are disabled for
> mainline (since they are already disabled).
>
> Similar to the fix done for enetc:
> 215602a8d212 ("enetc: use napi_schedule to be compatible with PREEMPT_RT")
>
> Signed-off-by: Seb Laveze <sebastien.laveze@....com>
Fixed up the commit message to appease checkpatch and applied, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists