[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210114115248.GA24592@localhost.localdomain>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 12:52:48 +0100
From: Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>
To: Muchun Song <songmuchun@...edance.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@...cle.com>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, mingo@...hat.com,
bp@...en8.de, x86@...nel.org, hpa@...or.com,
dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com, luto@...nel.org,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>, viro@...iv.linux.org.uk,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>, paulmck@...nel.org,
mchehab+huawei@...nel.org, pawan.kumar.gupta@...ux.intel.com,
Randy Dunlap <rdunlap@...radead.org>, oneukum@...e.com,
anshuman.khandual@....com, jroedel@...e.de,
Mina Almasry <almasrymina@...gle.com>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
"Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
HORIGUCHI NAOYA(堀口 直也)
<naoya.horiguchi@....com>,
Xiongchun duan <duanxiongchun@...edance.com>,
linux-doc@...r.kernel.org, LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [External] Re: [PATCH v12 04/13] mm/hugetlb: Free the vmemmap
pages associated with each HugeTLB page
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 06:54:30PM +0800, Muchun Song wrote:
> I think this approach may be only suitable for generic huge page only.
> So we can implement it only for huge page.
>
> Hi Oscar,
>
> What's your opinion about this?
I tried something like:
static void vmemmap_pte_range(pmd_t *pmd, unsigned long addr,
unsigned long end,
struct vmemmap_remap_walk *walk)
{
pte_t *pte;
pte = pte_offset_kernel(pmd, addr);
if (!walk->reuse_page) {
BUG_ON(pte_none(*pte));
walk->reuse_page = pte_page(*pte++);
addr = walk->remap_start;
}
for (; addr != end; addr += PAGE_SIZE, pte++) {
BUG_ON(pte_none(*pte));
walk->remap_pte(pte, addr, walk);
}
}
void vmemmap_remap_free(unsigned long start, unsigned long end,
unsigned long reuse)
{
LIST_HEAD(vmemmap_pages);
struct vmemmap_remap_walk walk = {
.remap_pte = vmemmap_remap_pte,
.reuse_addr = reuse,
.remap_start = start,
.vmemmap_pages = &vmemmap_pages,
};
BUG_ON(start != reuse + PAGE_SIZE);
vmemmap_remap_range(reuse, end, &walk);
free_vmemmap_page_list(&vmemmap_pages);
}
but it might overcomplicate things and I am not sure it is any better.
So I am fine with keeping it as is.
Should another user come in the future, we can always revisit.
Maybe just add a little comment in vmemmap_pte_range(), explaining while we
are "+= PAGE_SIZE" for address and I would like to see a comment in
vmemmap_remap_free why the BUG_ON and more important what it is checking.
--
Oscar Salvador
SUSE L3
Powered by blists - more mailing lists