[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+xgdS+vSTN81uLzahB9BYf=+iJdckwS=v7AwRACAf0wfw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:31:52 +0100
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] kasan, mm: fix conflicts with init_on_alloc/free
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 6:25 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> On 1/13/21 5:03 PM, Andrey Konovalov wrote:
> > A few places where SLUB accesses object's data or metadata were missed in
> > a previous patch. This leads to false positives with hardware tag-based
> > KASAN when bulk allocations are used with init_on_alloc/free.
> >
> > Fix the false-positives by resetting pointer tags during these accesses.
> >
> > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I50dd32838a666e173fe06c3c5c766f2c36aae901
> > Fixes: aa1ef4d7b3f67 ("kasan, mm: reset tags when accessing metadata")
> > Reported-by: Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
> > ---
> > mm/slub.c | 7 ++++---
> > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/slub.c b/mm/slub.c
> > index dc5b42e700b8..75fb097d990d 100644
> > --- a/mm/slub.c
> > +++ b/mm/slub.c
> > @@ -2791,7 +2791,8 @@ static __always_inline void maybe_wipe_obj_freeptr(struct kmem_cache *s,
> > void *obj)
> > {
> > if (unlikely(slab_want_init_on_free(s)) && obj)
> > - memset((void *)((char *)obj + s->offset), 0, sizeof(void *));
> > + memset((void *)((char *)kasan_reset_tag(obj) + s->offset),
> > + 0, sizeof(void *));
> > }
> >
> > /*
> > @@ -2883,7 +2884,7 @@ static __always_inline void *slab_alloc_node(struct kmem_cache *s,
> > stat(s, ALLOC_FASTPATH);
> > }
> >
> > - maybe_wipe_obj_freeptr(s, kasan_reset_tag(object));
> > + maybe_wipe_obj_freeptr(s, object);
>
> And in that case the reset was unnecessary, right. (commit log only mentions
> adding missing resets).
The reset has been moved into maybe_wipe_obj_freeptr(). I'll mention
it in the changelog in v2.
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists