[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+zATEUJX+hm0m=jX9Z61CFRoMN3hmHuk8AL1dFy3W9KAg@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 16:32:53 +0100
From: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will.deacon@....com>,
Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
Peter Collingbourne <pcc@...gle.com>,
Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
Kevin Brodsky <kevin.brodsky@....com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 13/14] kasan: add a test for kmem_cache_alloc/free_bulk
On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 5:38 PM Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com> wrote:
>
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 at 17:22, Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com> wrote:
> >
> > Add a test for kmem_cache_alloc/free_bulk to make sure there are now
> > false-positives when these functions are used.
>
> s/now/no/ (but by itself doesn't necessarily demand a v3)
>
> > Link: https://linux-review.googlesource.com/id/I2a8bf797aecf81baeac61380c567308f319e263d
> > Signed-off-by: Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
> > ---
> > lib/test_kasan.c | 39 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-----
> > 1 file changed, 34 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/lib/test_kasan.c b/lib/test_kasan.c
> > index 5e3d054e5b8c..d9f9a93922d5 100644
> > --- a/lib/test_kasan.c
> > +++ b/lib/test_kasan.c
> > @@ -479,10 +479,11 @@ static void kmem_cache_oob(struct kunit *test)
> > {
> > char *p;
> > size_t size = 200;
> > - struct kmem_cache *cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache",
> > - size, 0,
> > - 0, NULL);
> > + struct kmem_cache *cache;
> > +
> > + cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", size, 0, 0, NULL);
> > KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cache);
> > +
> > p = kmem_cache_alloc(cache, GFP_KERNEL);
> > if (!p) {
> > kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> > @@ -491,11 +492,12 @@ static void kmem_cache_oob(struct kunit *test)
> > }
> >
> > KUNIT_EXPECT_KASAN_FAIL(test, *p = p[size + OOB_TAG_OFF]);
> > +
> > kmem_cache_free(cache, p);
> > kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> > }
> >
> > -static void memcg_accounted_kmem_cache(struct kunit *test)
> > +static void kmem_cache_accounted(struct kunit *test)
> > {
> > int i;
> > char *p;
> > @@ -522,6 +524,32 @@ static void memcg_accounted_kmem_cache(struct kunit *test)
> > kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> > }
> >
> > +static void kmem_cache_bulk(struct kunit *test)
> > +{
> > + struct kmem_cache *cache;
> > + size_t size = 200;
> > + size_t p_size = 10;
>
> s/p_size/ARRAY_SIZE(p)/
> ?
>
> > + char *p[10];
> > + bool ret;
> > + int i;
> > +
> > + cache = kmem_cache_create("test_cache", size, 0, 0, NULL);
> > + KUNIT_ASSERT_NOT_ERR_OR_NULL(test, cache);
> > +
> > + ret = kmem_cache_alloc_bulk(cache, GFP_KERNEL, p_size, (void **)&p);
> > + if (!ret) {
> > + kunit_err(test, "Allocation failed: %s\n", __func__);
> > + kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + for (i = 0; i < p_size; i++)
> > + p[i][0] = p[i][size - 1] = 42;
> > +
> > + kmem_cache_free_bulk(cache, p_size, (void **)&p);
> > + kmem_cache_destroy(cache);
> > +}
> > +
> > static char global_array[10];
> >
> > static void kasan_global_oob(struct kunit *test)
> > @@ -961,7 +989,8 @@ static struct kunit_case kasan_kunit_test_cases[] = {
> > KUNIT_CASE(kfree_via_page),
> > KUNIT_CASE(kfree_via_phys),
> > KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_oob),
> > - KUNIT_CASE(memcg_accounted_kmem_cache),
> > + KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_accounted),
> > + KUNIT_CASE(kmem_cache_bulk),
> > KUNIT_CASE(kasan_global_oob),
> > KUNIT_CASE(kasan_stack_oob),
> > KUNIT_CASE(kasan_alloca_oob_left),
> > --
> > 2.30.0.284.gd98b1dd5eaa7-goog
> >
Will fix all in v3, thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists