[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210114161850.zjcfhsgtmojjjqba@linutronix.de>
Date: Thu, 14 Jan 2021 17:18:50 +0100
From: Sebastian Andrzej Siewior <bigeasy@...utronix.de>
To: Vitaly Wool <vitaly.wool@...sulko.com>
Cc: "tiantao (H)" <tiantao6@...wei.com>,
"Song Bao Hua (Barry Song)" <song.bao.hua@...ilicon.com>,
Shakeel Butt <shakeelb@...gle.com>,
Minchan Kim <minchan@...nel.org>,
Mike Galbraith <efault@....de>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>, NitinGupta <ngupta@...are.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
"tiantao (H)" <tiantao6@...ilicon.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] zsmalloc: do not use bit_spin_lock
On 2020-12-23 19:25:02 [+0100], Vitaly Wool wrote:
> > write the following patch according to your idea, what do you think ?
>
> Yep, that is basically what I was thinking of. Some nitpicks below:
Did this go somewhere? The thread just ends here on my end.
Mike, is this patch fixing / helping your case in anyway?
> Best regards,
> Vitaly
Sebastian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists