linux-kernel - Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: introduce checkpoint=merge mount option

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 22:33:37 +0800
From:   Chao Yu <chao@...nel.org>
To:     Daeho Jeong <daeho43@...il.com>, Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc:     Daeho Jeong <daehojeong@...gle.com>,
        Sungjong Seo <sj1557.seo@...sung.com>, kernel-team@...roid.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [PATCH v2 1/2] f2fs: introduce checkpoint=merge mount
 option

On 2021/1/15 22:00, Daeho Jeong wrote:
>> ktime_get() returns time based ns unit, in extreme scenario, average
>> time cp cost will overflow 32-bit variable, I doubt.
>>
> sum_diff is already turned into msec using ktime_ms_delta() above.

Yup, I missed ktime_ms_delta().


On 2021/1/15 22:23, Daeho Jeong wrote:
 >>> How about updating queued_ckpt and total_ckpt in batch, update atomic
 >>> variable one by one is low efficient.
 >>>
 >> You mean like using spin_lock()?
 >>
 > Ah, you mean like updating these values as much as the count of the
 > loop at once?

Correct. :)

Thanks,