[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAG211gFXExjp7Zh@ulmo>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 16:37:59 +0100
From: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
To: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
Cc: Jonathan Hunter <jonathanh@...dia.com>,
Sameer Pujar <spujar@...dia.com>,
Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>,
Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>,
Takashi Iwai <tiwai@...e.com>,
Jaroslav Kysela <perex@...ex.cz>, alsa-devel@...a-project.org,
linux-tegra@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1 3/5] ASoC: tegra: ahub: Use
of_reset_control_array_get_exclusive()
On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:58:32PM +0300, Dmitry Osipenko wrote:
> Some of resets are erroneously missed in the configlink_mods[], like APBIF
> for example. Use of_reset_control_array_get_exclusive() which requests all
> the resets. The problem was hidden by the clk driver which implicitly
> de-asserts the missing resets.
>
> Tested-by: Peter Geis <pgwipeout@...il.com>
> Tested-by: Nicolas Chauvet <kwizart@...il.com>
> Signed-off-by: Dmitry Osipenko <digetx@...il.com>
> ---
> sound/soc/tegra/tegra30_ahub.c | 66 +++++-----------------------------
> sound/soc/tegra/tegra30_ahub.h | 1 -
> 2 files changed, 9 insertions(+), 58 deletions(-)
Doing it this way is slightly suboptimal because now we don't actually
have a way of checking that the DT has all the necessary resets listed.
Can we not just make the list complete instead to keep the checks in
place? That should be a much smaller patch, too.
Thierry
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists