linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20210115171251.GF4384@sirena.org.uk>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 17:12:51 +0000
From:   Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Jiri Kosina <jikos@...nel.org>,
        Joe Lawrence <joe.lawrence@...hat.com>,
        Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
        Miroslav Benes <mbenes@...e.cz>,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, linux-doc@...r.kernel.org,
        live-patching@...r.kernel.org, linux-doc@...rt.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] Documentation: livepatch: document reliable stacktrace

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 04:47:18PM +0000, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 02:24:46PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:

> > +    3. Considerations
> > +       3.1 Identifying successful termination

> It looks like we forgot to update this with the addition of the new
> section 3, so this needs a trivial update to add that and fix the
> numbering.

Bah, I thought the point with structured documentation formats was that
tooling would handle stuff like this :/

> Otherwise this looks good; thanks for taking this off my hands! :)

Thanks for doing almost all the work!

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)