[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210115184006.GH4605@ziepe.ca>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:40:06 -0400
From: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>
To: Pavel Tatashin <pasha.tatashin@...een.com>
Cc: LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, linux-mm <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>,
Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Oscar Salvador <osalvador@...e.de>,
Dan Williams <dan.j.williams@...el.com>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>,
Tyler Hicks <tyhicks@...ux.microsoft.com>,
Joonsoo Kim <iamjoonsoo.kim@....com>, mike.kravetz@...cle.com,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Mel Gorman <mgorman@...e.de>,
Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
David Rientjes <rientjes@...gle.com>,
John Hubbard <jhubbard@...dia.com>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Ira Weiny <ira.weiny@...el.com>,
linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 08/10] mm/gup: limit number of gup migration failures,
honor failures
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 01:10:27PM -0500, Pavel Tatashin wrote:
> I've been thinking about this some more. Again, I am not sure this is
> a bug. I understand split_huge_pmd() may split the PMD size page into
> PTEs and leave the compound page intact. However, in order for pages[]
> to have non sequential addresses in compound page, those PTEs must
> also be migrated after split_huge_pmd(),
Why focus on migrated? Anything could happen to those PTEs: they could
be COW'd, they could be mmap/munmap'd, etc.
Jason
Powered by blists - more mailing lists