linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] initramfs: Provide a common initrd reserve function

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:44:42 +0800
From:   Kefeng Wang <wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com>
To:     Palmer Dabbelt <palmer@...belt.com>
CC:     <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>,
        <linux@...linux.org.uk>, Atish Patra <Atish.Patra@....com>,
        <guoren@...nel.org>, Paul Walmsley <paul.walmsley@...ive.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] initramfs: Provide a common initrd reserve function


On 2021/1/15 10:33, Palmer Dabbelt wrote:
> On Wed, 13 Jan 2021 18:33:58 PST (-0800), wangkefeng.wang@...wei.com 
> wrote:
>> The ARM and riscv have same logic to check and reserve
>> the memory of initrd, let's provide a common function to
>> reduce duplicated code.
>>
>> Add __LINUX_INITRD_H define in initrd.h to prevent build error
>> (found by kernel test robot <lkp@...el.com>) from the multiple
>> inclusion of same header file multiple time.
>
> This is doing a bunch of different things:
>
> * Fixing the lack of a preprocessor guard in initrd.h
> * Adding some generic code.
> * Converting two architectures over to that generic code.
>
> It needs to be split into four patches.  I'm happy to take them via 
> the RISC-V tree (with an Ack from for the arch/arm/ stuff), but not 
> all together.
>
> It looks like csky copied this as well, they at least have exactly the 
> same message.

Send v3， according to the suggestion，thanks.