linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 11/15] regulator: rohm-regulator: SNVS dvs and linear voltage support

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <87b957f904fc2621f0eca1dbd732828e1b24bf9a.camel@fi.rohmeurope.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 11:48:58 +0200
From:   Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-power@...rohmeurope.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH 11/15] regulator: rohm-regulator: SNVS dvs and linear
 voltage support

Hello All,
On Fri, 2021-01-15 at 08:26 +0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Fri, 08 Jan 2021, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> 
> > The helper for obtaining HW-state based DVS voltage levels
> > currently only
> > works for regulators using linear-ranges. Extend support to
> > regulators with
> > simple linear mappings and add also proper error path if pickable-
> > ranges
> > regulators call this.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
> > ---
> >  drivers/regulator/rohm-regulator.c | 23 +++++++++++++++++++++--
> >  include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h   |  6 +++++-
> >  2 files changed, 26 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> > 
> > diff --git a/drivers/regulator/rohm-regulator.c
> > b/drivers/regulator/rohm-regulator.c
> > index 399002383b28..9248bd63afa9 100644
> > --- a/drivers/regulator/rohm-regulator.c
> > +++ b/drivers/regulator/rohm-regulator.c
> > @@ -22,13 +22,26 @@ static int set_dvs_level(const struct
> > regulator_desc *desc,
> >  			return ret;
> >  		return 0;
> >  	}
> > -
> > +	/* If voltage is set to 0 => disable */
> >  	if (uv == 0) {
> >  		if (omask)
> >  			return regmap_update_bits(regmap, oreg, omask,
> > 0);
> >  	}
> > +	/* Some setups don't allow setting own voltage but do allow
> > enabling */
> > +	if (!mask) {
> > +		if (omask)
> > +			return regmap_update_bits(regmap, oreg, omask,
> > omask);
> > +
> > +		return -EINVAL;
> > +	}
> >  	for (i = 0; i < desc->n_voltages; i++) {
> > -		ret = regulator_desc_list_voltage_linear_range(desc,
> > i);
> > +		/* NOTE to next hacker - Does not support pickable
> > ranges */
> > +		if (desc->linear_range_selectors)
> > +			return -EINVAL;
> > +		if (desc->n_linear_ranges)
> > +			ret =
> > regulator_desc_list_voltage_linear_range(desc, i);
> > +		else
> > +			ret = regulator_desc_list_voltage_linear(desc,
> > i);
> >  		if (ret < 0)
> >  			continue;
> >  		if (ret == uv) {
> > @@ -79,6 +92,12 @@ int rohm_regulator_set_dvs_levels(const struct
> > rohm_dvs_config *dvs,
> >  				mask = dvs->lpsr_mask;
> >  				omask = dvs->lpsr_on_mask;
> >  				break;
> > +			case ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_SNVS:
> > +				prop = "rohm,dvs-snvs-voltage";
> > +				reg = dvs->snvs_reg;
> > +				mask = dvs->snvs_mask;
> > +				omask = dvs->snvs_on_mask;
> > +				break;
> >  			default:
> >  				return -EINVAL;
> >  			}
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > b/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > index e99e569d3cc1..2f5fbfd0c6b3 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > +++ b/include/linux/mfd/rohm-generic.h
> > @@ -27,7 +27,8 @@ enum {
> >  	ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_IDLE,
> >  	ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_SUSPEND,
> >  	ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_LPSR,
> > -	ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_MAX = ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_LPSR,
> > +	ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_SNVS,
> > +	ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_MAX = ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_SNVS,
> >  };
> 
> Does this actually work?
> 
> The code that consumes it looks like:
> 
>     for (i = 0; i < ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_MAX && !ret; i++)
> 
> So it will loop through like:
> 
> 0 (ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_IDLE)
> 1 (ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_SUSPEND)
> 2 (ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_LPSR)
> 3 (ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_SNVS)
> 
> Then break, since 'i' will be (== 4) not (< 4).
> 
> So the following will never be used:
> 
> 4 (ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_MAX = ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_SNVS)
> 
> Unless I'm missing something, I think MAX should be the last entry.

I did some further digging. The first enum member is
ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_UNKNOWN => first valid value is 1 (ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_RUN).

=> logic for this part was correct.

But I think there is a problem in how these enum values are used!

for example at bd718x7_regulator.c

.level_map = ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_RUN | ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_IDLE |  
                                     ROHM_DVS_LEVEL_SUSPEND


This works for values 1 & 2 - but fails miserably for 3...

I see these levels are also used by various boards - so I wonder how
they have worked - and I wonder if fixing this will cause problems...

I will any way send a patch (separately from this series as I guess
this should be fixed rather sooner than later) to fix this.

> 
> >  /**
> > @@ -66,6 +67,9 @@ struct rohm_dvs_config {
> >  	unsigned int lpsr_reg;
> >  	unsigned int lpsr_mask;
> >  	unsigned int lpsr_on_mask;
> > +	unsigned int snvs_reg;
> > +	unsigned int snvs_mask;
> > +	unsigned int snvs_on_mask;
> >  };
> >  
> >  #if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_REGULATOR_ROHM)