[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAFmLzVnVzzUit4T@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 10:53:51 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Jason Baron <jbaron@...mai.com>
Cc: pbonzini@...hat.com, seanjc@...gle.com, kvm@...r.kernel.org,
x86@...nel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 3/3] KVM: x86: use static calls to reduce kvm_x86_ops
overhead
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:45:49AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 10:27:56PM -0500, Jason Baron wrote:
> > diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > index 5060922..9d4492b 100644
> > --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
> > @@ -1350,7 +1350,7 @@ void kvm_arch_free_vm(struct kvm *kvm);
> > static inline int kvm_arch_flush_remote_tlb(struct kvm *kvm)
> > {
> > if (kvm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush &&
> > - !kvm_x86_ops.tlb_remote_flush(kvm))
> > + !static_call(kvm_x86_tlb_remote_flush)(kvm))
> > return 0;
> > else
> > return -ENOTSUPP;
>
> Would you be able to use something like this?
>
> https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20201110101307.GO2651@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net
>
> we could also add __static_call_return1(), if that would help.
Something like so on top of the above.
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/static_call.c
@@ -17,6 +17,7 @@ static void __ref __static_call_transfor
* disp16 disp16 xorq %rax, %rax - a single 5 byte instruction that clears %rax
*/
static const u8 ret0[5] = { 0x66, 0x66, 0x48, 0x31, 0xc0 };
+ static const u8 ret1[5] = { 0xb8, 0x01, 0x00, 0x00, 0x00 }; /* mov $0x1,%eax */
int size = CALL_INSN_SIZE;
const void *emulate = NULL;
const void *code;
@@ -27,7 +28,11 @@ static void __ref __static_call_transfor
if (func == &__static_call_return0) {
emulate = code;
code = ret0;
+ } else if (func == &__static_call_return1) {
+ emulate = code;
+ code = ret1;
}
+
break;
case NOP:
--- a/include/linux/static_call.h
+++ b/include/linux/static_call.h
@@ -137,6 +137,7 @@ extern void arch_static_call_transform(v
#ifdef CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL_INLINE
extern long __static_call_return0(void);
+extern long __static_call_return1(void);
extern int __init static_call_init(void);
@@ -190,6 +191,7 @@ extern int static_call_text_reserved(voi
#elif defined(CONFIG_HAVE_STATIC_CALL)
static inline long __static_call_return0(void) { return 0; }
+static inline long __static_call_return0(void) { return 1; }
static inline int static_call_init(void) { return 0; }
@@ -239,6 +241,7 @@ static inline int static_call_text_reser
#else /* Generic implementation */
static inline long __static_call_return0(void) { return 0; }
+static inline long __static_call_return0(void) { return 1; }
static inline int static_call_init(void) { return 0; }
--- a/kernel/static_call.c
+++ b/kernel/static_call.c
@@ -443,6 +443,11 @@ long __static_call_return0(void)
return 0;
}
+long __static_call_return1(void)
+{
+ return 1;
+}
+
#ifdef CONFIG_STATIC_CALL_SELFTEST
static int func_a(int x)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists