lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:27:58 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>,
        Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 065/103] bcache: set bcache device into read-only mode for BCH_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_OBSO_LARGE_BUCKET

From: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>

commit 5342fd4255021ef0c4ce7be52eea1c4ebda11c63 upstream.

If BCH_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_OBSO_LARGE_BUCKET is set in incompat feature
set, it means the cache device is created with obsoleted layout with
obso_bucket_site_hi. Now bcache does not support this feature bit, a new
BCH_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LOG_LARGE_BUCKET_SIZE incompat feature bit is added
for a better layout to support large bucket size.

For the legacy compatibility purpose, if a cache device created with
obsoleted BCH_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_OBSO_LARGE_BUCKET feature bit, all bcache
devices attached to this cache set should be set to read-only. Then the
dirty data can be written back to backing device before re-create the
cache device with BCH_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_LOG_LARGE_BUCKET_SIZE feature bit
by the latest bcache-tools.

This patch checks BCH_FEATURE_INCOMPAT_OBSO_LARGE_BUCKET feature bit
when running a cache set and attach a bcache device to the cache set. If
this bit is set,
- When run a cache set, print an error kernel message to indicate all
  following attached bcache device will be read-only.
- When attach a bcache device, print an error kernel message to indicate
  the attached bcache device will be read-only, and ask users to update
  to latest bcache-tools.

Such change is only for cache device whose bucket size >= 32MB, this is
for the zoned SSD and almost nobody uses such large bucket size at this
moment. If you don't explicit set a large bucket size for a zoned SSD,
such change is totally transparent to your bcache device.

Fixes: ffa470327572 ("bcache: add bucket_size_hi into struct cache_sb_disk for large bucket")
Signed-off-by: Coly Li <colyli@...e.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/md/bcache/super.c |   15 +++++++++++++++
 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+)

--- a/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
+++ b/drivers/md/bcache/super.c
@@ -1341,6 +1341,12 @@ int bch_cached_dev_attach(struct cached_
 	bcache_device_link(&dc->disk, c, "bdev");
 	atomic_inc(&c->attached_dev_nr);
 
+	if (bch_has_feature_obso_large_bucket(&(c->cache->sb))) {
+		pr_err("The obsoleted large bucket layout is unsupported, set the bcache device into read-only\n");
+		pr_err("Please update to the latest bcache-tools to create the cache device\n");
+		set_disk_ro(dc->disk.disk, 1);
+	}
+
 	/* Allow the writeback thread to proceed */
 	up_write(&dc->writeback_lock);
 
@@ -1564,6 +1570,12 @@ static int flash_dev_run(struct cache_se
 
 	bcache_device_link(d, c, "volume");
 
+	if (bch_has_feature_obso_large_bucket(&c->cache->sb)) {
+		pr_err("The obsoleted large bucket layout is unsupported, set the bcache device into read-only\n");
+		pr_err("Please update to the latest bcache-tools to create the cache device\n");
+		set_disk_ro(d->disk, 1);
+	}
+
 	return 0;
 err:
 	kobject_put(&d->kobj);
@@ -2123,6 +2135,9 @@ static int run_cache_set(struct cache_se
 	c->cache->sb.last_mount = (u32)ktime_get_real_seconds();
 	bcache_write_super(c);
 
+	if (bch_has_feature_obso_large_bucket(&c->cache->sb))
+		pr_err("Detect obsoleted large bucket layout, all attached bcache device will be read-only\n");
+
 	list_for_each_entry_safe(dc, t, &uncached_devices, list)
 		bch_cached_dev_attach(dc, c, NULL);
 


Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ