linux-kernel - [PATCH 5.10 059/103] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Fail new xfers if xfer/cancel/abort pending

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 13:27:52 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org, Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>,
        Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
        Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.10 059/103] spi: spi-geni-qcom: Fail new xfers if xfer/cancel/abort pending

From: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>

commit 690d8b917bbe64772cb0b652311bcd50908aea6b upstream.

If we got a timeout when trying to send an abort command then it means
that we just got 3 timeouts in a row:

1. The original timeout that caused handle_fifo_timeout() to be
   called.
2. A one second timeout waiting for the cancel command to finish.
3. A one second timeout waiting for the abort command to finish.

SPI is clocked by the controller, so nothing (aside from a hardware
fault or a totally broken sequencer) should be causing the actual
commands to fail in hardware.  However, even though the hardware
itself is not expected to fail (and it'd be hard to predict how we
should handle things if it did), it's easy to hit the timeout case by
simply blocking our interrupt handler from running for a long period
of time.  Obviously the system is in pretty bad shape if a interrupt
handler is blocked for > 2 seconds, but there are certainly bugs (even
bugs in other unrelated drivers) that can make this happen.

Let's make things a bit more robust against this case.  If we fail to
abort we'll set a flag and then we'll block all future transfers until
we have no more interrupts pending.

Fixes: 561de45f72bd ("spi: spi-geni-qcom: Add SPI driver support for GENI based QUP")
Signed-off-by: Douglas Anderson <dianders@...omium.org>
Reviewed-by: Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20201217142842.v3.2.Ibade998ed587e070388b4bf58801f1107a40eb53@changeid
Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c |   59 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
 1 file changed, 57 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c
+++ b/drivers/spi/spi-geni-qcom.c
@@ -83,6 +83,7 @@ struct spi_geni_master {
 	spinlock_t lock;
 	int irq;
 	bool cs_flag;
+	bool abort_failed;
 };
 
 static int get_spi_clk_cfg(unsigned int speed_hz,
@@ -141,8 +142,49 @@ static void handle_fifo_timeout(struct s
 	spin_unlock_irq(&mas->lock);
 
 	time_left = wait_for_completion_timeout(&mas->abort_done, HZ);
-	if (!time_left)
+	if (!time_left) {
 		dev_err(mas->dev, "Failed to cancel/abort m_cmd\n");
+
+		/*
+		 * No need for a lock since SPI core has a lock and we never
+		 * access this from an interrupt.
+		 */
+		mas->abort_failed = true;
+	}
+}
+
+static bool spi_geni_is_abort_still_pending(struct spi_geni_master *mas)
+{
+	struct geni_se *se = &mas->se;
+	u32 m_irq, m_irq_en;
+
+	if (!mas->abort_failed)
+		return false;
+
+	/*
+	 * The only known case where a transfer times out and then a cancel
+	 * times out then an abort times out is if something is blocking our
+	 * interrupt handler from running.  Avoid starting any new transfers
+	 * until that sorts itself out.
+	 */
+	spin_lock_irq(&mas->lock);
+	m_irq = readl(se->base + SE_GENI_M_IRQ_STATUS);
+	m_irq_en = readl(se->base + SE_GENI_M_IRQ_EN);
+	spin_unlock_irq(&mas->lock);
+
+	if (m_irq & m_irq_en) {
+		dev_err(mas->dev, "Interrupts pending after abort: %#010x\n",
+			m_irq & m_irq_en);
+		return true;
+	}
+
+	/*
+	 * If we're here the problem resolved itself so no need to check more
+	 * on future transfers.
+	 */
+	mas->abort_failed = false;
+
+	return false;
 }
 
 static void spi_geni_set_cs(struct spi_device *slv, bool set_flag)
@@ -158,9 +200,15 @@ static void spi_geni_set_cs(struct spi_d
 	if (set_flag == mas->cs_flag)
 		return;
 
+	pm_runtime_get_sync(mas->dev);
+
+	if (spi_geni_is_abort_still_pending(mas)) {
+		dev_err(mas->dev, "Can't set chip select\n");
+		goto exit;
+	}
+
 	mas->cs_flag = set_flag;
 
-	pm_runtime_get_sync(mas->dev);
 	spin_lock_irq(&mas->lock);
 	reinit_completion(&mas->cs_done);
 	if (set_flag)
@@ -173,6 +221,7 @@ static void spi_geni_set_cs(struct spi_d
 	if (!time_left)
 		handle_fifo_timeout(spi, NULL);
 
+exit:
 	pm_runtime_put(mas->dev);
 }
 
@@ -280,6 +329,9 @@ static int spi_geni_prepare_message(stru
 	int ret;
 	struct spi_geni_master *mas = spi_master_get_devdata(spi);
 
+	if (spi_geni_is_abort_still_pending(mas))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
 	ret = setup_fifo_params(spi_msg->spi, spi);
 	if (ret)
 		dev_err(mas->dev, "Couldn't select mode %d\n", ret);
@@ -495,6 +547,9 @@ static int spi_geni_transfer_one(struct
 {
 	struct spi_geni_master *mas = spi_master_get_devdata(spi);
 
+	if (spi_geni_is_abort_still_pending(mas))
+		return -EBUSY;
+
 	/* Terminate and return success for 0 byte length transfer */
 	if (!xfer->len)
 		return 0;