| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20210115130229.GG2771@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 18:32:29 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: AngeloGioacchino Del Regno
<angelogioacchino.delregno@...ainline.org>
Cc: Stephen Boyd <sboyd@...nel.org>, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>,
Vivek Aknurwar <viveka@...eaurora.org>,
Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>,
Michael Turquette <mturquette@...libre.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
Taniya Das <tdas@...eaurora.org>, linux-clk@...r.kernel.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Jeevan Shriram <jshriram@...eaurora.org>,
konrad.dybcio@...ainline.org, marijn.suijten@...ainline.org,
martin.botka@...ainline.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/4] clk: qcom: clk-alpha-pll: Add support for Lucid 5LPE
PLL
On 13-01-21, 23:39, AngeloGioacchino Del Regno wrote:
> Il 05/01/21 16:46, Vinod Koul ha scritto:
> > From: Vivek Aknurwar <viveka@...eaurora.org>
> >
> > Lucid 5LPE is a slightly different Lucid PLL with different offsets and
> > porgramming sequence so add support for these
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Vivek Aknurwar <viveka@...eaurora.org>
> > Signed-off-by: Jeevan Shriram <jshriram@...eaurora.org>
> > [vkoul: rebase and tidy up for upstream]
> > Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
> > ---
> > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c | 217 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> > drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.h | 4 +
> > 2 files changed, 221 insertions(+)
> >
> > diff --git a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> > index f7721088494c..843c43649a5a 100644
> > --- a/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> > +++ b/drivers/clk/qcom/clk-alpha-pll.c
> > @@ -156,6 +156,12 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_regs);
> > /* LUCID PLL specific settings and offsets */
> > #define LUCID_PCAL_DONE BIT(27)
> > +/* LUCID 5LPE PLL specific settings and offsets */
> > +#define LUCID_5LPE_PCAL_DONE BIT(11)
> > +#define LUCID_5LPE_ALPHA_PLL_ACK_LATCH BIT(13)
> > +#define LUCID_5LPE_PLL_LATCH_INPUT BIT(14)
> > +#define LUCID_5LPE_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN BIT(21)
> > +
> > #define pll_alpha_width(p) \
> > ((PLL_ALPHA_VAL_U(p) - PLL_ALPHA_VAL(p) == 4) ? \
> > ALPHA_REG_BITWIDTH : ALPHA_REG_16BIT_WIDTH)
> > @@ -1600,3 +1606,214 @@ const struct clk_ops clk_alpha_pll_agera_ops = {
> > .set_rate = clk_alpha_pll_agera_set_rate,
> > };
> > EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(clk_alpha_pll_agera_ops);
> > +
> > +static int alpha_pll_lucid_5lpe_enable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> > + u32 val;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* If in FSM mode, just vote for it */
> > + if (val & LUCID_5LPE_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN) {
> > + ret = clk_enable_regmap(hw);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + return wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Check if PLL is already enabled, return if enabled */
> > + ret = trion_pll_is_enabled(pll, pll->clkr.regmap);
> > + if (ret < 0)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_RESET_N, PLL_RESET_N);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_OPMODE(pll), PLL_RUN);
> > +
> > + ret = wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Enable the PLL outputs */
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), PLL_OUT_MASK, PLL_OUT_MASK);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Enable the global PLL outputs */
> > + return regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_OUTCTRL, PLL_OUTCTRL);
> > +}
> > +
> > +static void alpha_pll_lucid_5lpe_disable(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> > + u32 val;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + ret = regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), &val);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* If in FSM mode, just unvote it */
> > + if (val & LUCID_5LPE_ENABLE_VOTE_RUN) {
> > + clk_disable_regmap(hw);
> > + return;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Disable the global PLL output */
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), PLL_OUTCTRL, 0);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* Disable the PLL outputs */
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_USER_CTL(pll), PLL_OUT_MASK, 0);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return;
> > +
> > + /* Place the PLL mode in STANDBY */
> > + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_OPMODE(pll), PLL_STANDBY);
> > +}
> > +
> > +/*
> > + * The Lucid 5LPE PLL requires a power-on self-calibration which happens
> > + * when the PLL comes out of reset. Calibrate in case it is not completed.
> > + */
> > +static int alpha_pll_lucid_5lpe_prepare(struct clk_hw *hw)
> > +{
> > + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> > + struct clk_hw *p;
> > + u32 val;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + /* Return early if calibration is not needed. */
> > + regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), &val);
> > + if (val & LUCID_5LPE_PCAL_DONE)
> > + return 0;
> > +
> > + p = clk_hw_get_parent(hw);
> > + if (!p)
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > +
> > + ret = alpha_pll_lucid_5lpe_enable(hw);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + alpha_pll_lucid_5lpe_disable(hw);
> > +
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
> > +static int alpha_pll_lucid_5lpe_set_rate(struct clk_hw *hw, unsigned long rate,
> > + unsigned long prate)
> > +{
> > + struct clk_alpha_pll *pll = to_clk_alpha_pll(hw);
> > + unsigned long rrate;
> > + u32 val, l;
> > + u64 a;
> > + int ret;
> > +
> > + rrate = alpha_pll_round_rate(rate, prate, &l, &a, ALPHA_REG_16BIT_WIDTH);
> > +
> > + /*
> > + * Due to a limited number of bits for fractional rate programming, the
> > + * rounded up rate could be marginally higher than the requested rate.
> > + */
> > + ret = alpha_pll_check_rate_margin(hw, rrate, rate);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_L_VAL(pll), l);
> > + regmap_write(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_ALPHA_VAL(pll), a);
> > +
> > + /* Latch the PLL input */
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll),
> > + LUCID_5LPE_PLL_LATCH_INPUT, LUCID_5LPE_PLL_LATCH_INPUT);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + /* Wait for 2 reference cycles before checking the ACK bit. */
> > + udelay(1);
> > + regmap_read(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), &val);
> > + if (!(val & LUCID_5LPE_ALPHA_PLL_ACK_LATCH)) {
> > + pr_err("Lucid 5LPE PLL latch failed. Output may be unstable!\n");
> > + return -EINVAL;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Return the latch input to 0 */
> > + ret = regmap_update_bits(pll->clkr.regmap, PLL_MODE(pll), LUCID_5LPE_PLL_LATCH_INPUT, 0);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > +
> > + if (clk_hw_is_enabled(hw)) {
> > + ret = wait_for_pll_enable_lock(pll);
> > + if (ret)
> > + return ret;
> > + }
> > +
> > + /* Wait for PLL output to stabilize */
> > + udelay(100);
> > + return 0;
> > +}
> > +
>
> This one looks exactly like alpha_pll_trion_set_rate() but:
> 1. You are forcing ALPHA_REG_16BIT_WIDTH for the alpha_pll_round_rate
> call: this is bad, you should actually use pll_alpha_width(pll) here,
> unless you have a very good reason that I didn't understand...
> 2. The only change between these two functions (trion and
> lucid_5lpe_set_rate) is that PLL_UPDATE becomes
> LUCID_5LPE_PLL_LATCH_INPUT, and that you check for
> LUCID_5LPE_ALPHA_PLL_ACK_LATCH instead of ALPHA_PLL_ACK_LATCH: this
> looks like being 95% code duplication.
>
> The best options here, in my opinion, would be to commonize the function
> alpha_pll_trion_set_rate: that will avoid this huge duplication.
Yeah I agree we could reuse, I can redo this. I was thinking of making
this bit as one of the values in register and use that but that does not
look good as this is not a register offset, so only option is to have a
new type of PLL for this and use that as here..
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists