[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <YAGS2mulIw6o+sY5@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:04:26 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: "Paul E. McKenney" <paulmck@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Lai Jiangshan <jiangshanlai@...il.com>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Valentin Schneider <valentin.schneider@....com>,
Qian Cai <cai@...hat.com>,
Vincent Donnefort <vincent.donnefort@....com>,
Dexuan Cui <decui@...rosoft.com>,
Lai Jiangshan <laijs@...ux.alibaba.com>,
Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH -tip V3 0/8] workqueue: break affinity initiatively
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 10:11:51AM +0100, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 12, 2021 at 03:53:24PM -0800, Paul E. McKenney wrote:
> > An SRCU-P run on the new series reproduced the warning below. Repeat-by:
> >
> > tools/testing/selftests/rcutorture/bin/kvm.sh --allcpus --duration 10 --configs "112*SRCU-P" --bootargs "rcupdate.rcu_cpu_stall_suppress_at_boot=1 torture.disable_onoff_at_boot rcupdate.rcu_task_stall_timeout=30000 rcutree.softirq=0" --trust-make
>
> Lemme go wake up an EX ;-)
Whee, rescuer thread goes wobbly... took a few hours but there you have
it.
All I've got so far is fugly, gotta think harder.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists