[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CANiDSCvuvj47=nhoWhvzc5raMxM60w+JYRWjd0YepcbcbkrUjA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 14:08:14 +0100
From: Ricardo Ribalda <ribalda@...omium.org>
To: ". Christoph Hellwig" <hch@....de>
Cc: Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
Tomasz Figa <tfiga@...omium.org>,
Marek Szyprowski <m.szyprowski@...sung.com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab@...nel.org>,
IOMMU DRIVERS <iommu@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Linux Doc Mailing List <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Media Mailing List <linux-media@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <senozhatsky@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 5/6] media: uvcvideo: Use dma_alloc_noncontiguos API
On Mon, Jan 11, 2021 at 9:36 AM . Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jan 07, 2021 at 03:14:08PM +0100, Ricardo Ribalda wrote:
> > > So I think we do want these branches for coherent vs non-coherent as they
> > > have very different semantics and I do not think that hiding them under
> > > the same API helps people to understand those vastly different semantics.
> > >
> > > OTOH we should look into a fallback for DMA API instances that do not
> > > support the discontigous allocations.
> > >
> > > I think between your comments and those from Ricardo I have a good idea
> > > for a somewhat updated API. I'll try to post something in the next days.
> >
> > Did you have time to look into this?
> >
> > No hurry, I just want to make sure that I didn't miss anything ;)
>
> Haven't managed to get to it, sorry.
No worries!, is there something we can do to help you with this?
>
> >
> > Best regards!
> >
> >
> >
> > --
> > Ricardo Ribalda
> ---end quoted text---
--
Ricardo Ribalda
Powered by blists - more mailing lists