[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <BEEC2888CE24964AA5C6EAB9EA9DA122272F78@dggemi529-mbs.china.huawei.com>
Date: Fri, 15 Jan 2021 02:32:39 +0000
From: zhangqiumiao <zhangqiumiao1@...wei.com>
To: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
CC: "jirislaby@...nel.org" <jirislaby@...nel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-serial@...r.kernel.org" <linux-serial@...r.kernel.org>,
"Chenxiang (EulerOS)" <rose.chen@...wei.com>,
"Yanan (Euler)" <yanan@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3] tty: make pl011 serial port driver support 485 mode
On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 08:28:30PM +0800, zhangqiumiao1@...wei.com wrote:
> From: Qiumiao Zhang <zhangqiumiao1@...wei.com>
>
> make pl011 serial port support 485 mode full duplex communication
>
> Signed-off-by: Qiumiao Zhang <zhangqiumiao1@...wei.com>
> ---
> Changes in v3:
> -Fix busy loop forever in pl011_tx_empty
> -Move the definition of cr into uart_amba_port
> -run checkpatch with no error or warning
>
> Changes in v2:
> -Fix two compilation errors
>
> drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c index c255476..9da10a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> +++ b/drivers/tty/serial/amba-pl011.c
> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>
> #include "amba-pl011.h"
>
> +#define ISEMPTY 1
> #define UART_NR 14
>
> #define SERIAL_AMBA_MAJOR 204
> @@ -264,6 +265,7 @@ struct uart_amba_port {
> unsigned int fifosize; /* vendor-specific */
> unsigned int old_cr; /* state during shutdown */
> unsigned int fixed_baud; /* vendor-set fixed baud rate */
> + unsigned int cr;
> char type[12];
> #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_ENGINE
> /* DMA stuff */
> @@ -1284,6 +1286,8 @@ static inline bool pl011_dma_rx_running(struct uart_amba_port *uap)
> #define pl011_dma_flush_buffer NULL
> #endif
>
> +static unsigned int pl011_tx_empty(struct uart_port *port);
> +
> static void pl011_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port) {
> struct uart_amba_port *uap =
> @@ -1292,6 +1296,17 @@ static void pl011_stop_tx(struct uart_port *port)
> uap->im &= ~UART011_TXIM;
> pl011_write(uap->im, uap, REG_IMSC);
> pl011_dma_tx_stop(uap);
> + if (port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_ENABLED) {
> + while(pl011_tx_empty(port) != ISEMPTY) ;
I intend to change this to:
while(pl011_tx_empty(port) != ISEMPTY)
cpu_relax();
Is this ok?
> +
> + uap->cr = pl011_read(uap, REG_CR);
> + if (port->rs485.flags & SER_RS485_RTS_AFTER_SEND) {
> + uap->cr |= UART011_CR_RTS;
> + } else {
> + uap->cr &= ~UART011_CR_RTS;
> + }
Checkpatch doesn't find the problem here. Please tell me what's wrong here?
thanks,
Qiumiao Zhang
Powered by blists - more mailing lists