lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <04cc328a-5e5b-bccc-340b-db074055bf78@gmail.com>
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:01:51 -0800
From:   Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
To:     Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>,
        Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
        Vivien Didelot <vivien.didelot@...il.com>,
        Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     Tobias Waldekranz <tobias@...dekranz.com>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH net-next 2/2] net: dsa: mv88e6xxx: use
 mv88e6185_g1_vtu_getnext() for the 6250



On 1/15/2021 6:39 PM, Rasmus Villemoes wrote:
> mv88e6250_g1_vtu_getnext is almost identical to
> mv88e6185_g1_vtu_getnext, except for the 6250 only having 64 databases
> instead of 256. We can reduce code duplication by simply masking off
> the extra two garbage bits when assembling the fid from VTU op [3:0]
> and [11:8].
> 
> Signed-off-by: Rasmus Villemoes <rasmus.villemoes@...vas.dk>

Reviewed-by: Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>
-- 
Florian

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ