lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAAeHK+x36J6a4GOpEpff0BKwCKgFTuRsGiyXyScRek3hVAbSJA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Sat, 16 Jan 2021 15:09:31 +0100
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 1/4] kasan, arm64: Add KASAN light mode

On Sat, Jan 16, 2021 at 2:43 PM Vincenzo Frascino
<vincenzo.frascino@....com> wrote:
> On 1/15/21 3:08 PM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> > On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 12:00:40PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
> >> Architectures supported by KASAN HW can provide a light mode of
> >> execution. On an MTE enabled arm64 hw for example this can be identified
> >> with the asynch mode of execution.
> >> In this mode, if a tag check fault occurs, the TFSR_EL1 register is
> >> updated asynchronously. The kernel checks the corresponding bits
> >> periodically.
> >
> > What's the expected usage of this relative to prod, given that this has
> > to be chosen at boot time? When/where is this expected to be used
> > relative to prod mode?

Hi Mark,

Sync + no panic (what is called prod right now) + logging is for the
initial MTE integration stage as causing panics is risky. There's no
way to know how often MTE-detected bugs will happen during normal
usage as the kernel is buggy.

Eventually, we're hoping to switch to sync + panic to allow MTE to act
as a security mitigation. For devices where the slowdown caused by
sync is untolerable, there'll be an option to use async, which is
significantly faster. The exact perf numbers are yet to be measured
properly, I'll share them with one of the future patches.

Thanks!

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ