[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210116202922.147964-1-martin.blumenstingl@googlemail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 21:29:22 +0100
From: Martin Blumenstingl <martin.blumenstingl@...glemail.com>
To: olek2@...pl
Cc: devicetree@...r.kernel.org, john@...ozen.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, tsbogend@...ha.franken.de
Subject: RE: [PATCH] dt-bindings: mips: lantiq: Document Lantiq Xway CGU bindings
(sorry for only seeing this late)
[...]
> +maintainers:
> + - John Crispin <john@...ozen.org>
personally I think we should get at least John's Acked-by but I don't
know if there's any rule for adding a dt-binding for some other
maintainer
[...]
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
based on "DOs and DON’Ts for designing and writing Devicetree bindings"
from [0] I think this is incomplete
As far as I know CGU contains some PLLs. These PLLs need at least one
input: the main XTAL which is found on the board
Also the Lantiq code does not use the common clock framework yet. Once
that's used we also need #clock-cells = <1>. I don't know if that
should be added already (or not).
> +examples:
> + - |
> + cgu@...000 {
this should be clock-controller@...
Best regards,
Martin
[0] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/devicetree/bindings/writing-bindings.html
Powered by blists - more mailing lists