[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAOZdJXUO9nC2JoadaZ8HgwuAGEYV=Hiz8g6y94jzCLp2mJP8nA@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 16 Jan 2021 14:54:52 -0600
From: Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>
To: Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>
Cc: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
lkml <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
Roman Fietze <roman.fietze@...na.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] lib/hexdump: introduce DUMP_PREFIX_UNHASHED for unhashed addresses
On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 3:24 AM Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com> wrote:
> By other words, every print_hex_dump() used need to be reviewed in
> which context might be called.
I did a rough analysis of all current usage of DUMP_PREFIX_ADDRESS in
the kernel, compared to the introduction of %px and hashed addresses,
using git-blame to find the most recent commit that modifies a line
that contains _ADDRESS. Of 150 cases, 110 of them are newer than %px,
so I'm assuming that these developers chose _ADDRESS instead of
_OFFSET knowing that the addresses are hashed.
> > If you want, I can include a patch that changes a few callers of
> > print_hex_dump() to use DUMP_PREFIX_UNHASHED, based on what I think would be
> > useful.
>
> It would be nice.
I have a v2 that I'm about to post, and I included a patch that
modifies check_poison_mem() in mm/page_poison.c. I chose this file
because I figured actual addresses would probably be necessary for
tracking memory-related errors. Also, that call to print_hex_dump()
was added back in 2009, so it predates the introduction of %px.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists