lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Fri, 15 Jan 2021 21:41:30 -0700
From:   David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
To:     Matteo Croce <mcroce@...ux.microsoft.com>,
        Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org>
Cc:     netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
        Hideaki YOSHIFUJI <yoshfuji@...ux-ipv6.org>,
        Thomas Graf <tgraf@...g.ch>, David Ahern <dsahern@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH net 0/2] ipv6: fixes for the multicast routes

On 1/15/21 4:12 PM, Matteo Croce wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:50 PM Jakub Kicinski <kuba@...nel.org> wrote:
>>
>> On Fri, 15 Jan 2021 19:42:07 +0100 Matteo Croce wrote:
>>> From: Matteo Croce <mcroce@...rosoft.com>
>>>
>>> Fix two wrong flags in the IPv6 multicast routes created
>>> by the autoconf code.
>>
>> Any chance for Fixes tags here?
> 
> Right.
> For 1/2 I don't know exactly, that code was touched last time in
> 86872cb57925 ("[IPv6] route: FIB6 configuration using struct
> fib6_config"), but it was only refactored. Before 86872cb57925, it was
> pushed in the git import commit by Linus: 1da177e4c3f4
> ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2").
> BTW, according the history repo, it entered the tree in the 2.4.0
> import, so I'd say it's here since the beginning.
> 
> While for 2/2 I'd say:
> 
> Fixes: e8478e80e5a7 ("net/ipv6: Save route type in rt6_info")
> 

As I recall (memory jogging from commit description) my patch only moved
the setting from ip6_route_info_create default to here.

The change is correct, just thinking it goes back beyond 4.16. If
someone has a system running a 4.14 or earlier kernel it should be easy
to know if this was the default prior.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists