[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210118162014.GN4455@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 16:20:14 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Mauro Carvalho Chehab <mchehab+huawei@...nel.org>
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Liam Girdwood <lgirdwood@...il.com>,
Mayulong <mayulong1@...wei.com>,
Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>, devel@...verdev.osuosl.org,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 11/13] regulator: hi6421v600-regulator: move it from
staging
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 05:02:45PM +0100, Mauro Carvalho Chehab wrote:
> Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org> escreveu:
> > If for some reason the PMIC is sufficiently fragile to need a delay
> > between enables it's not clear why the driver is doing it before
> > enabling rather than after, presumably there's issues with the regulator
> > ramping up and stabalising its output
> I don't have any datasheets or documentation from this device, except for
> the Linaro's official driver for Kernel 4.9 (from where this driver
> was originally ported), and a high-level documentation for this
> hardware at 96boards site, which doesn't cover any details.
This misses the point. To repeat, if the driver is hard coding
a delay why is the driver doing this *before* rather than *after*
enabling?
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists