[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <4cbd024b-b57e-e7ae-276a-a285c898bb30@fb.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:36:17 -0800
From: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
To: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>, <bpf@...r.kernel.org>
CC: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andrii.nakryiko@...il.com>,
KP Singh <kpsingh@...omium.org>,
Florent Revest <revest@...omium.org>,
Lukas Bulwahn <lukas.bulwahn@...il.com>,
<linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 2/2] docs: bpf: Clarify -mcpu=v3 requirement
for atomic ops
On 1/18/21 7:57 AM, Brendan Jackman wrote:
> Alexei pointed out [1] that this wording is pretty confusing. Here's
> an attempt to be more explicit and clear.
>
> [1] https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/CAADnVQJVvwoZsE1K+6qRxzF7+6CvZNzygnoBW9tZNWJELk5c=Q@mail.gmail.com/T/#m07264fc18fdc43af02fc1320968afefcc73d96f4
>
> Signed-off-by: Brendan Jackman <jackmanb@...gle.com>
Thanks for better description!
Acked-by: Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists