[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <dfedd14c-01a3-75f7-c180-74b74c120da3@suse.cz>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 18:41:13 +0100
From: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
To: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@...eaurora.org>,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, mhocko@...e.com, khalid.aziz@...cle.com,
ngupta@...ingupta.dev, vinmenon@...eaurora.org
Cc: linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH V3] mm/compaction: correct deferral logic for proactive
compaction
On 1/18/21 6:12 PM, Charan Teja Reddy wrote:
> should_proactive_compact_node() returns true when sum of the
> weighted fragmentation score of all the zones in the node is greater
> than the wmark_high of compaction, which then triggers the proactive
> compaction that operates on the individual zones of the node. But
> proactive compaction runs on the zone only when its weighted
> fragmentation score is greater than wmark_low(=wmark_high - 10).
>
> This means that the sum of the weighted fragmentation scores of all the
> zones can exceed the wmark_high but individual weighted fragmentation
> zone scores can still be less than wmark_low which makes the unnecessary
> trigger of the proactive compaction only to return doing nothing.
>
> Issue with the return of proactive compaction with out even trying is
> its deferral. It is simply deferred for 1 << COMPACT_MAX_DEFER_SHIFT if
> the scores across the proactive compaction is same, thinking that
> compaction didn't make any progress but in reality it didn't even try.
> With the delay between successive retries for proactive compaction is
> 500msec, it can result into the deferral for ~30sec with out even trying
> the proactive compaction.
>
> Test scenario is that: compaction_proactiveness=50 thus the wmark_low =
> 50 and wmark_high = 60. System have 2 zones(Normal and Movable) with
> sizes 5GB and 6GB respectively. After opening some apps on the android,
> the weighted fragmentation scores of these zones are 47 and 49
> respectively. Since the sum of these fragmentation scores are above the
> wmark_high which triggers the proactive compaction and there since the
> individual zones weighted fragmentation scores are below wmark_low, it
> returns without trying the proactive compaction. As a result the
> weighted fragmentation scores of the zones are still 47 and 49 which
> makes the existing logic to defer the compaction thinking that
> noprogress is made across the compaction.
>
> Fix this by checking just zone fragmentation score, not the weighted, in
> __compact_finished() and use the zones weighted fragmentation score in
> fragmentation_score_node(). In the test case above, If the weighted
> average of is above wmark_high, then individual score (not adjusted) of
> atleast one zone has to be above wmark_high. Thus it avoids the
> unnecessary trigger and deferrals of the proactive compaction.
>
> Fix-suggested-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
> Signed-off-by: Charan Teja Reddy <charante@...eaurora.org>
Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Thanks!
Powered by blists - more mailing lists