lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <583b1769-0f35-8f77-8570-2cc41612e4d4@redhat.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 19:18:45 +0100
From:   Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@...hat.com>
To:     Ben Gardon <bgardon@...gle.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kvm@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Peter Xu <peterx@...hat.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
        Peter Shier <pshier@...gle.com>,
        Sean Christopherson <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>,
        Thomas Huth <thuth@...hat.com>, Jacob Xu <jacobhxu@...gle.com>,
        Makarand Sonare <makarandsonare@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/6] KVM: selftests: Perf test cleanups and memslot
 modification test

On 12/01/21 22:42, Ben Gardon wrote:
> This series contains a few cleanups that didn't make it into previous
> series, including some cosmetic changes and small bug fixes. The series
> also lays the groundwork for a memslot modification test which stresses
> the memslot update and page fault code paths in an attempt to expose races.
> 
> Tested: dirty_log_perf_test, memslot_modification_stress_test, and
> 	demand_paging_test were run, with all the patches in this series
> 	applied, on an Intel Skylake machine.
> 
> 	echo Y > /sys/module/kvm/parameters/tdp_mmu; \
> 	./memslot_modification_stress_test -i 1000 -v 64 -b 1G; \
> 	./memslot_modification_stress_test -i 1000 -v 64 -b 64M -o; \
> 	./dirty_log_perf_test -v 64 -b 1G; \
> 	./dirty_log_perf_test -v 64 -b 64M -o; \
> 	./demand_paging_test -v 64 -b 1G; \
> 	./demand_paging_test -v 64 -b 64M -o; \
> 	echo N > /sys/module/kvm/parameters/tdp_mmu; \
> 	./memslot_modification_stress_test -i 1000 -v 64 -b 1G; \
> 	./memslot_modification_stress_test -i 1000 -v 64 -b 64M -o; \
> 	./dirty_log_perf_test -v 64 -b 1G; \
> 	./dirty_log_perf_test -v 64 -b 64M -o; \
> 	./demand_paging_test -v 64 -b 1G; \
> 	./demand_paging_test -v 64 -b 64M -o
> 
> 	The tests behaved as expected, and fixed the problem of the
> 	population stage being skipped in dirty_log_perf_test. This can be
> 	seen in the output, with the population stage taking about the time
> 	dirty pass 1 took and dirty pass 1 falling closer to the times for
> 	the other passes.
> 
> Note that when running these tests, the -o option causes the test to take
> much longer as the work each vCPU must do increases proportional to the
> number of vCPUs.
> 
> You can view this series in Gerrit at:
> https://linux-review.googlesource.com/c/linux/kernel/git/torvalds/linux/+/7216
> 
> Ben Gardon (6):
>    KVM: selftests: Rename timespec_diff_now to timespec_elapsed
>    KVM: selftests: Avoid flooding debug log while populating memory
>    KVM: selftests: Convert iterations to int in dirty_log_perf_test
>    KVM: selftests: Fix population stage in dirty_log_perf_test
>    KVM: selftests: Add option to overlap vCPU memory access
>    KVM: selftests: Add memslot modification stress test
> 
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/.gitignore        |   1 +
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/Makefile          |   1 +
>   .../selftests/kvm/demand_paging_test.c        |  40 +++-
>   .../selftests/kvm/dirty_log_perf_test.c       |  72 +++---
>   .../selftests/kvm/include/perf_test_util.h    |   4 +-
>   .../testing/selftests/kvm/include/test_util.h |   2 +-
>   .../selftests/kvm/lib/perf_test_util.c        |  25 ++-
>   tools/testing/selftests/kvm/lib/test_util.c   |   2 +-
>   .../kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c    | 211 ++++++++++++++++++
>   9 files changed, 307 insertions(+), 51 deletions(-)
>   create mode 100644 tools/testing/selftests/kvm/memslot_modification_stress_test.c
> 

Queued, thanks.

Paolo

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ