lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:14:48 -0800
From:   Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>
To:     Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com>
Cc:     LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        io-uring <io-uring@...r.kernel.org>,
        Kernel Hardening <kernel-hardening@...ts.openwall.com>,
        Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        Alexey Gladkov <legion@...nel.org>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        "Eric W . Biederman" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>, Jens Axboe <axboe@...nel.dk>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Oleg Nesterov <oleg@...hat.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v3 1/8] Use refcount_t for ucounts reference counting

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 6:59 AM Alexey Gladkov <gladkov.alexey@...il.com> wrote:
>
> @@ -152,10 +153,7 @@ static struct ucounts *get_ucounts(struct user_namespace *ns, kuid_t uid)
>                         ucounts = new;
>                 }
>         }
> -       if (ucounts->count == INT_MAX)
> -               ucounts = NULL;
> -       else
> -               ucounts->count += 1;
> +       refcount_inc(&ucounts->count);
>         spin_unlock_irq(&ucounts_lock);
>         return ucounts;
>  }

This is wrong.

It used to return NULL when the count saturated.

Now it just silently saturates.

I'm not sure how many people care, but that NULL return ends up being
returned quite widely (through "inc_uncount()" and friends).

The fact that this has no commit message at all to explain what it is
doing and why is also a grounds for just NAK.

           Linus

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ