lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 17:30:25 +1100
From:   David Gibson <david@...son.dropbear.id.au>
To:     Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org>
Cc:     Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Pantelis Antoniou <pantelis.antoniou@...sulko.com>,
        Frank Rowand <frowand.list@...il.com>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
        Vincent Guittot <vincent.guittot@...aro.org>,
        Bill Mills <bill.mills@...aro.org>,
        Anmar Oueja <anmar.oueja@...aro.org>,
        Masahiro Yamada <masahiroy@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] of: unittest: Statically apply overlays using fdtoverlay

On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 11:14:50AM +0530, Viresh Kumar wrote:
> +David,
> 
> On 14-01-21, 09:01, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 13, 2021 at 11:03 PM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > >
> > > On 11-01-21, 09:46, Rob Herring wrote:
> > > > On Fri, Jan 8, 2021 at 2:41 AM Viresh Kumar <viresh.kumar@...aro.org> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > Now that fdtoverlay is part of the kernel build, start using it to test
> > > > > the unitest overlays we have by applying them statically.
> > > >
> > > > Nice idea.
> > > >
> > > > > The file overlay_base.dtb have symbols of its own and we need to apply
> > > > > overlay.dtb to overlay_base.dtb alone first to make it work, which gives
> > > > > us intermediate-overlay.dtb file.
> > > >
> > > > Okay? If restructuring things helps we should do that. Frank?
> > >
> > > Frank, do we want to do something about it ? Maybe make overlay_base.dts an dtsi
> > > and include it from testcases.dts like the other ones ?
> > 
> > No, because overlay_base.dts is an overlay dt.

So.. I was confused for a bit here, because the overlay_base.dts
you're discussing is the one in the kernel tree, not the one in the
dtc tree.

The kernel file is confusing to me.  It has the /plugin/ tag which
should be used for overlays, but the rest of the file looks like a
base tree rather than an overlay.  There's even a comment saying "Base
device tree that overlays will be applied against".  But it goes on to
talk about __fixups__ and __local__fixups__ which will never be
generated for a based tree.

Oh.. and then there's terminology confusion.  dtc has had compile time
resolved overlays for a very long time.  Those are usually .dtsi
files, and should generally not have /plugin/.

More recent is the support for run-time overlays - .dtbo output files,
which are usually generated from a .dts with /plugin/.  They usually
should *not* have a "/ { ... } " stanza, since that indicates the base
portion of the tree.

> What property of a file makes it an overlay ? Just the presence of
> /plugin/; ?

Yes and no.  Generally that's how it should work , but it looks to me
like the presence of /plugin/ there is just wrong.  /plugin/ basically
just activates some extra dtc features, though, so it is possible to
"manually" construct a valid overlay without it.

> David, we are talking about the overlay base[1] file here. The
> fdtoverlay tool
> fails to apply it to testcases.dts file (in the same directory) because none of
> its nodes have the __overlay__ label and the dtc routine overlay_merge() [2]
> skips them intentionally.

testcases.dts also has /plugin/ and again, it's not really clear if
that's right.

The point of /plugin/ is that it will automatically generate the
__overlay__ subnodes from dtc's &label { ... } or &{/path} { ... }
syntax, so you wouldn't expect to see __overlay__ in the source.

> > I think we need an
> > empty, minimal base.dtb to apply overlay_base.dtbo to.
> 
> One way out is adding an (almost-empty) testcase-data-2 in testcases.dtb, that
> will make it work.
> 
> > And then fdtoverlay needs a fix to apply overlays to the root node?
> 
> It isn't just root node I think, but any node for which the __overlay__ label
> isn't there.
> 
> So this can make it all work if everyone is fine with it:
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts
> index 99ab9d12d00b..59172c4c9e5a 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts
> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/overlay_base.dts
> @@ -11,8 +11,7 @@
>   * dtc will create nodes "/__symbols__" and "/__local_fixups__".
>   */
>  
> -/ {
> -       testcase-data-2 {
> +       &overlay_base {
>                 #address-cells = <1>;
>                 #size-cells = <1>;
>  
> @@ -89,5 +88,3 @@ retail_1: vending@...00 {
>                 };
>  
>         };
> -};
> -
> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts b/drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts
> index a85b5e1c381a..539dc7d9eddc 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts
> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/testcases.dts
> @@ -11,6 +11,11 @@ node-remove {
>                         };
>                 };
>         };
> +
> +       overlay_base: testcase-data-2 {
> +               #address-cells = <1>;
> +               #size-cells = <1>;
> +       };
> 
> -------------------------8<-------------------------
> 
> And then we can do this to the Makefile over my changes.
> 
> -------------------------8<-------------------------
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile
> index 9f3eb30b78f1..8cc23311b778 100644
> --- a/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/of/unittest-data/Makefile
> @@ -41,7 +41,6 @@ DTC_FLAGS_testcases += -Wno-interrupts_property
>  
>  # Apply all overlays (except overlay_bad_* as they are not supposed to apply and
>  # fail build) statically with fdtoverlay
> -intermediate-overlay   := overlay.dtb
>  master                 := overlay_0.dtb overlay_1.dtb overlay_2.dtb \
>                            overlay_3.dtb overlay_4.dtb overlay_5.dtb \
>                            overlay_6.dtb overlay_7.dtb overlay_8.dtb \
> @@ -50,15 +49,12 @@ master                      := overlay_0.dtb overlay_1.dtb overlay_2.dtb \
>                            overlay_gpio_01.dtb overlay_gpio_02a.dtb \
>                            overlay_gpio_02b.dtb overlay_gpio_03.dtb \
>                            overlay_gpio_04a.dtb overlay_gpio_04b.dtb \
> -                          intermediate-overlay.dtb
> +                          overlay_base.dtb overlay.dtb
>  
>  quiet_cmd_fdtoverlay = fdtoverlay $@
>        cmd_fdtoverlay = $(objtree)/scripts/dtc/fdtoverlay -o $@ -i $^
>  
> -$(obj)/intermediate-overlay.dtb: $(obj)/overlay_base.dtb $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(intermediate-overlay))
> -       $(call if_changed,fdtoverlay)
> -
>  $(obj)/master.dtb: $(obj)/testcases.dtb $(addprefix $(obj)/,$(master))
>         $(call if_changed,fdtoverlay)
>  
> -always-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += intermediate-overlay.dtb master.dtb
> +always-$(CONFIG_OF_OVERLAY) += master.dtb
> 

-- 
David Gibson			| I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au	| minimalist, thank you.  NOT _the_ _other_
				| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson

Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (834 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ