linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] kbuild: give SUBLEVEL more room in KERNEL

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <YAVTDETPaJuaRPfc@kroah.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 10:21:16 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Cc:     masahiroy@...nel.org, michal.lkml@...kovi.net,
        torvalds@...ux-foundation.org, linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, stable@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kbuild: give SUBLEVEL more room in KERNEL_VERSION

On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 08:49:51PM -0500, Sasha Levin wrote:
> SUBLEVEL only has 8 bits of space, which means that we'll overflow it
> once it reaches 256.
> 
> Few of the stable branches will imminently overflow SUBLEVEL while
> there's no risk of overflowing VERSION.
> 
> Thus, give SUBLEVEL 8 more bits which will be stolen from VERSION, this
> should create a better balance between the different version numbers we
> use.
> 
> The downside here is that Linus will have 8 bits less to play with, but
> given our current release cadence (~10 weeks), the number of Linus's
> fingers & toes (20), and the current VERSION (5) we can calculate that
> VERSION will overflow in just over 1,000 years, so I'm kicking this can
> down the road.
> 
> Cc: stable@...nel.org
> Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
> ---
>  Makefile | 4 ++--
>  1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
> 
> diff --git a/Makefile b/Makefile
> index 9e73f82e0d863..dc2bad7a440d8 100644
> --- a/Makefile
> +++ b/Makefile
> @@ -1252,8 +1252,8 @@ endef
>  
>  define filechk_version.h
>  	echo \#define LINUX_VERSION_CODE $(shell                         \
> -	expr $(VERSION) \* 65536 + 0$(PATCHLEVEL) \* 256 + 0$(SUBLEVEL)); \
> -	echo '#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 16) + ((b) << 8) + (c))'
> +	expr $(VERSION) \* 16777216 + 0$(PATCHLEVEL) \* 65536 + 0$(SUBLEVEL)); \
> +	echo '#define KERNEL_VERSION(a,b,c) (((a) << 24) + ((b) << 16) + (c))'

As much as I agree, this will break in-tree users of LINUX_VERSION_CODE
that try to suck out the version/patchlevel number of the kernel release
into their own fields.  Things like USB host controller strings, v4l
ioctl reports, scsi driver ioctls, and other places do fun bit-movements
to try to unreverse this bit packing.

So how about we just provide a "real" version/subversion/revision
#define as well, and clean up all in-kernel users, so we can get this to
work, and we can change it in the future more easily.

thanks,

greg k-h