[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20210118094533.2874082-10-maz@kernel.org>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:45:21 +0000
From: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
David Brazdil <dbrazdil@...gle.com>,
Alexandru Elisei <alexandru.elisei@....com>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
Jing Zhang <jingzhangos@...gle.com>,
Ajay Patil <pajay@....qualcomm.com>,
Prasad Sodagudi <psodagud@...eaurora.org>,
Srinivas Ramana <sramana@...eaurora.org>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Suzuki K Poulose <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
kernel-team@...roid.com
Subject: [PATCH v4 09/21] arm64: cpufeature: Add global feature override facility
Add a facility to globally override a feature, no matter what
the HW says. Yes, this sounds dangerous, but we do respect the
"safe" value for a given feature. This doesn't mean the user
doesn't need to know what they are doing.
Nothing uses this yet, so we are pretty safe. For now.
Signed-off-by: Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
---
arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h | 2 ++
arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c | 44 +++++++++++++++++++++++++----
2 files changed, 41 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
index 9a555809b89c..465d2cb63bfc 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
+++ b/arch/arm64/include/asm/cpufeature.h
@@ -75,6 +75,8 @@ struct arm64_ftr_reg {
u64 sys_val;
u64 user_val;
const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftr_bits;
+ u64 *override_val;
+ u64 *override_mask;
};
extern struct arm64_ftr_reg arm64_ftr_reg_ctrel0;
diff --git a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
index e99eddec0a46..aaa075c6f029 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
+++ b/arch/arm64/kernel/cpufeature.c
@@ -544,13 +544,17 @@ static const struct arm64_ftr_bits ftr_raz[] = {
ARM64_FTR_END,
};
-#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) { \
- .sys_id = id, \
- .reg = &(struct arm64_ftr_reg){ \
- .name = #id, \
- .ftr_bits = &((table)[0]), \
+#define ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, v, m) { \
+ .sys_id = id, \
+ .reg = &(struct arm64_ftr_reg){ \
+ .name = #id, \
+ .ftr_bits = &((table)[0]), \
+ .override_val = v, \
+ .override_mask = m, \
}}
+#define ARM64_FTR_REG(id, table) ARM64_FTR_REG_OVERRIDE(id, table, NULL, NULL)
+
static const struct __ftr_reg_entry {
u32 sys_id;
struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg;
@@ -760,6 +764,7 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
u64 strict_mask = ~0x0ULL;
u64 user_mask = 0;
u64 valid_mask = 0;
+ u64 override_val = 0, override_mask = 0;
const struct arm64_ftr_bits *ftrp;
struct arm64_ftr_reg *reg = get_arm64_ftr_reg(sys_reg);
@@ -767,9 +772,38 @@ static void __init init_cpu_ftr_reg(u32 sys_reg, u64 new)
if (!reg)
return;
+ if (reg->override_mask && reg->override_val) {
+ override_mask = *reg->override_mask;
+ override_val = *reg->override_val;
+ }
+
for (ftrp = reg->ftr_bits; ftrp->width; ftrp++) {
u64 ftr_mask = arm64_ftr_mask(ftrp);
s64 ftr_new = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, new);
+ s64 ftr_ovr = arm64_ftr_value(ftrp, override_val);
+
+ if ((ftr_mask & override_mask) == ftr_mask) {
+ s64 tmp = arm64_ftr_safe_value(ftrp, ftr_ovr, ftr_new);
+ char *str = NULL;
+
+ if (ftr_ovr != tmp) {
+ /* Unsafe, remove the override */
+ *reg->override_mask &= ~ftr_mask;
+ *reg->override_val &= ~ftr_mask;
+ tmp = ftr_ovr;
+ str = "ignoring override";
+ } else if (ftr_new != tmp) {
+ /* Override was valid */
+ ftr_new = tmp;
+ str = "forced";
+ }
+
+ if (str)
+ pr_warn("%s[%d:%d]: %s to %llx\n",
+ reg->name,
+ ftrp->shift + ftrp->width - 1,
+ ftrp->shift, str, tmp);
+ }
val = arm64_ftr_set_value(ftrp, val, ftr_new);
--
2.29.2
Powered by blists - more mailing lists