linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: mte: Optimize mte_assign_mem_tag

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 11:00:38 +0000
From:   Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
To:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>
Cc:     linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        kasan-dev@...glegroups.com,
        Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
        Evgenii Stepanov <eugenis@...gle.com>,
        Branislav Rankov <Branislav.Rankov@....com>,
        Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/4] arm64: mte: Optimize mte_assign_mem_tag_range()



On 1/18/21 10:41 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
> On Sun, Jan 17, 2021 at 12:27:08PM +0000, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
>> Hi Mark,
>>
>> On 1/16/21 2:22 PM, Vincenzo Frascino wrote:
>>>> Is there any chance that this can be used for the last bytes of the
>>>> virtual address space? This might need to change to `_addr == _end` if
>>>> that is possible, otherwise it'll terminate early in that case.
>>>>
>>> Theoretically it is a possibility. I will change the condition and add a note
>>> for that.
>>>
>>
>> I was thinking to the end of the virtual address space scenario and I forgot
>> that if I use a condition like `_addr == _end` the tagging operation overflows
>> to the first granule of the next allocation. This disrupts tagging accesses for
>> that memory area hence I think that `_addr < _end` is the way to go.
> 
> I think it implies `_addr != _end` is necessary. Otherwise, if `addr` is
> PAGE_SIZE from the end of memory, and `size` is PAGE_SIZE, `_end` will
> be 0, so using `_addr < _end` will mean the loop will terminate after a
> single MTE tag granule rather than the whole page.
> 
> Generally, for some addr/increment/size combination (where all are
> suitably aligned), you need a pattern like:
> 
> | do {
> |       thing(addr);
> |       addr += increment;
> | } while (addr != end);
> 
> ... or:
> 
> | for (addr = start; addr != end; addr += increment) {
> |       thing(addr);
> | }
> 
> ... to correctly handle working at the very end of the VA space.
> 
> We do similar for page tables, e.g. when we use pmd_addr_end().
>

Good point! I agree it wraps around otherwise. I will change it accordingly.

Thanks!

> Thanks,
> Mark.
> 

-- 
Regards,
Vincenzo