linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 1/2] arm: lib: xor-neon: remove unnecessary GCC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:33:29 +0100
From:   Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org>
To:     Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com>
Cc:     Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Nathan Chancellor <natechancellor@...il.com>,
        Nick Desaulniers <ndesaulniers@...gle.com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Russell King <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
        Ard Biesheuvel <ardb@...nel.org>,
        Arvind Sankar <nivedita@...m.mit.edu>,
        clang-built-linux <clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com>,
        Collabora kernel ML <kernel@...labora.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 RESEND 1/2] arm: lib: xor-neon: remove unnecessary GCC
 < 4.6 warning

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:28 PM Adrian Ratiu
<adrian.ratiu@...labora.com> wrote:
> On Mon, 18 Jan 2021, Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...nel.org> wrote:
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:56 AM Adrian Ratiu <adrian.ratiu@...labora.com> wrote:
>
> No, clang does not produce vectorized code by default, not even
> with the -ftree-vectorize flag explicitely added like in the next
> patch in this series (that flag is enabled by default in clang
> anyway, so no effect).
>
> Clang needs more investigation and testing because with additional
> code changes it can be "forced" to output vectorized code, but
> that is outside the scope of this series.
>
> If you think it's a good idea I can add a warning only for Clang
> which makes more sense than telling clang users to upgrade their
> GCC, since now Clang is officially supported. What do you think?

Yes, either a warning or a Kconfig check seems better to me than
just trying to build code that ends up not doing what it is meant to.

       Arnd