[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <a184c21f-2b1f-bd00-5ca9-be7649b33ccd@huawei.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 09:18:51 +0800
From: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@...wei.com>
To: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>
CC: <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>, <kvm@...r.kernel.org>,
<kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu>, Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>,
Joerg Roedel <joro@...tes.org>,
Daniel Lezcano <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
"Suzuki K Poulose" <suzuki.poulose@....com>,
Julien Thierry <julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
Alexios Zavras <alexios.zavras@...el.com>,
<wanghaibin.wang@...wei.com>, <jiangkunkun@...wei.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kvm: arm64: Properly align the end address of table walk
On 2021/1/15 18:23, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Jan 15, 2021 at 05:53:07PM +0800, Keqian Zhu wrote:
>> When align the end address, ought to use its original value.
>>
>> Fixes: b1e57de62cfb ("KVM: arm64: Add stand-alone page-table walker infrastructure")
>> Signed-off-by: Keqian Zhu <zhukeqian1@...wei.com>
>> ---
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
>> index bdf8e55ed308..670b0ef12440 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/pgtable.c
>> @@ -296,7 +296,7 @@ int kvm_pgtable_walk(struct kvm_pgtable *pgt, u64 addr, u64 size,
>> struct kvm_pgtable_walk_data walk_data = {
>> .pgt = pgt,
>> .addr = ALIGN_DOWN(addr, PAGE_SIZE),
>> - .end = PAGE_ALIGN(walk_data.addr + size),
>> + .end = PAGE_ALIGN(addr + size),
>> .walker = walker,
>
> Hmm, this is a change in behaviour, no (consider the case where both 'addr'
> and 'size' are misaligned)? The current code is consistent with the
> kerneldoc in asm/kvm_pgtable.h, so I don't see the motivation to change it.
>
> Did you hit a bug somewhere?
>
> Will
> .
>
Not hit a bug, I just read the code to implement a new idea of stage2 DBM
support [1]. Yes, according to doc, this is not an issue ("The offset of
@addr within a page is ignored."). Sorry to disturb ;-).
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/kvmarm/fd26654b-8258-061c-2a69-90b961c1c71b@huawei.com/
Thanks,
Keqian
Powered by blists - more mailing lists