lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAMuHMdUxAEE2A=dyhdH5Tscin_=m_b61WfRpLvj6pJfdPjd1nA@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:27:32 +0100
From:   Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
To:     Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com>
Cc:     Karol Gugala <kgugala@...micro.com>,
        Mateusz Holenko <mholenko@...micro.com>,
        Gabriel Somlo <gsomlo@...il.com>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-riscv <linux-riscv@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] drivers/soc/litex: Add restart handler

Hi Stafford,

On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 12:43 PM Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com> wrote:
> On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 02:48:49PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > On Thu, Jan 14, 2021 at 3:03 AM Stafford Horne <shorne@...il.com> wrote:
> > > On Mon, Jan 04, 2021 at 05:49:03PM +0100, Geert Uytterhoeven wrote:
> > > > On Mon, Jan 4, 2021 at 5:45 PM Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org> wrote:
> > > > > Let the LiteX SoC Controller a register a restart handler, which resets
> > > > > the LiteX SoC by writing 1 to CSR_CTRL_RESET_ADDR.
> > > > >
> > > > > Signed-off-by: Geert Uytterhoeven <geert@...ux-m68k.org>
> > > > > ---
> > > > > Tested with linux-on-litex-vexriscv.
> > > > >
> > > > > This patch is based on upstream, i.e. not on top of Gabriel Somlo's
> > > > > "[PATCH v5 0/4] drivers/soc/litex: support 32-bit subregisters, 64-bit
> > > > > CPUs"
> > > > > (https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/20201227161320.2194830-1-gsomlo@gmail.com/)
> > > >
> > > > Bummer, and that's why the RESET_REG_* definitions are no longer
> > > > next to the SCRATCH_REG_* definitions :-(
> > >
> > > If it helps I have accepted Gabriel's patches and put them onto for-next.
> > >
> > >   https://github.com/openrisc/linux/commits/for-next
> > >
> > > I am happy to take and test a patch based on that.  Or I can do the adjustments
> > > to base the patch on that myself.  Let me know.
> >
> > Thanks for letting me know! V3 sent.
>
> Hi Geert,
>
> I don't seem to see v3 anywhere.  Where did you send it and what is the subject?

https://lore.kernel.org/linux-riscv/20210114134813.2238587-1-geert@linux-m68k.org/

So "b4 am 20210114134813.2238587-1-geert@...ux-m68k.org" should give you
a copy.

Thanks!

Gr{oetje,eeting}s,

                        Geert

-- 
Geert Uytterhoeven -- There's lots of Linux beyond ia32 -- geert@...ux-m68k.org

In personal conversations with technical people, I call myself a hacker. But
when I'm talking to journalists I just say "programmer" or something like that.
                                -- Linus Torvalds

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ