[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <47b0905a-4496-2f21-3b17-91988aa88e91@pengutronix.de>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 12:42:12 +0100
From: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
To: Jonathan Cameron <jic23@...nel.org>,
Olivier Moysan <olivier.moysan@...com>,
Fabrice Gasnier <fabrice.gasnier@...com>
Cc: Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@...afoo.de>,
Peter Meerwald-Stadler <pmeerw@...erw.net>,
Maxime Coquelin <mcoquelin.stm32@...il.com>,
Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
kernel@...gutronix.de, Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>,
Holger Assmann <has@...gutronix.de>, linux-iio@...r.kernel.org,
linux-stm32@...md-mailman.stormreply.com,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] iio: adc: stm32-adc: fix erroneous handling of spurious
IRQs
Hello Jonathan,
On 16.01.21 18:53, Jonathan Cameron wrote:
> On Tue, 12 Jan 2021 16:24:42 +0100
> Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de> wrote:
>
>> 1c6c69525b40 ("genirq: Reject bogus threaded irq requests") makes sure
>> that threaded IRQs either
>> - have IRQF_ONESHOT set
>> - don't have the default just return IRQ_WAKE_THREAD primary handler
>>
>> This is necessary because level-triggered interrupts need to be masked,
>> either at device or irqchip, to avoid an interrupt storm.
>>
>> For spurious interrupts, the STM32 ADC driver still does this bogus
>> request though:
>> - It doesn't set IRQF_ONESHOT
>> - Its primary handler just returns IRQ_WAKE_THREAD if the interrupt
>> is unexpected, i.e. !(status & enabled_mask)
>
> This seems 'unusual'. If this is a spurious interrupt we should be
> returning IRQ_NONE and letting the spurious interrupt protection
> stuff kick in.
>
> The only reason I can see that it does this is print an error message.
> I'm not sure why we need to go into the thread to do that given
> it's not supposed to happen. If we need that message at all, I'd
> suggest doing it in the interrupt handler then return IRQ_NONE;
As described, I run into the spurious IRQ case, so I think the message is
still useful (until that's properly fixed), but yes, it should've returned
IRQ_NONE in that case.
With these changes, IRQF_ONESHOT shouldn't be necessary, but in practice
the driver doesn't function correctly with the primary IRQ handler threaded.
Olivier, Fabrice: Are you aware of this problem?
Cheers,
Ahmad
>
>> - stm32mp151.dtsi describes the ADC interrupt as level-triggered
>>
>> Fix this by setting IRQF_ONESHOT to have the irqchip mask the IRQ
>> until the IRQ thread has finished.
>>
>> IRQF_ONESHOT also has the effect that the primary handler is no longer
>> forced into a thread. This makes the issue with spurious interrupts
>> interrupts disappear when reading the ADC on a threadirqs=1 kernel.
>> This used to result in following kernel error message:
>>
>> iio iio:device1: Unexpected IRQ: IER=0x00000000, ISR=0x0000100e
>> or
>> iio iio:device1: Unexpected IRQ: IER=0x00000004, ISR=0x0000100a
>>
>> But with this patch applied (or threaded IRQs disabled), this no longer
>> occurs.
>>
>> Cc: Lucas Stach <l.stach@...gutronix.de>
>> Reported-by: Holger Assmann <has@...gutronix.de>
>> Fixes: 695e2f5c289b ("iio: adc: stm32-adc: fix a regression when using dma and irq")
>> Signed-off-by: Ahmad Fatoum <a.fatoum@...gutronix.de>
>> ---
>> drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c | 2 +-
>> 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
>> index c067c994dae2..7e0e21c79ac8 100644
>> --- a/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
>> +++ b/drivers/iio/adc/stm32-adc.c
>> @@ -1910,7 +1910,7 @@ static int stm32_adc_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
>>
>> ret = devm_request_threaded_irq(&pdev->dev, adc->irq, stm32_adc_isr,
>> stm32_adc_threaded_isr,
>> - 0, pdev->name, indio_dev);
>> + IRQF_ONESHOT, pdev->name, indio_dev);
>> if (ret) {
>> dev_err(&pdev->dev, "failed to request IRQ\n");
>> return ret;
>
>
--
Pengutronix e.K. | |
Steuerwalder Str. 21 | http://www.pengutronix.de/ |
31137 Hildesheim, Germany | Phone: +49-5121-206917-0 |
Amtsgericht Hildesheim, HRA 2686 | Fax: +49-5121-206917-5555 |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists