[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210118152323.GV4077@smile.fi.intel.com>
Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 17:23:23 +0200
From: "andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com"
<andriy.shevchenko@...ux.intel.com>
To: Barnabás Pőcze <pobrn@...tonmail.com>
Cc: Daniel Scally <djrscally@...il.com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org" <linux-acpi@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org" <linux-gpio@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org" <linux-i2c@...r.kernel.org>,
"platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org"
<platform-driver-x86@...r.kernel.org>,
"devel@...ica.org" <devel@...ica.org>,
"rjw@...ysocki.net" <rjw@...ysocki.net>,
"lenb@...nel.org" <lenb@...nel.org>,
"andy@...nel.org" <andy@...nel.org>,
"mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com" <mika.westerberg@...ux.intel.com>,
"linus.walleij@...aro.org" <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
"bgolaszewski@...libre.com" <bgolaszewski@...libre.com>,
"wsa@...nel.org" <wsa@...nel.org>,
"lee.jones@...aro.org" <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
"hdegoede@...hat.com" <hdegoede@...hat.com>,
"mgross@...ux.intel.com" <mgross@...ux.intel.com>,
"robert.moore@...el.com" <robert.moore@...el.com>,
"erik.kaneda@...el.com" <erik.kaneda@...el.com>,
"sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com" <sakari.ailus@...ux.intel.com>,
"laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com"
<laurent.pinchart@...asonboard.com>,
"kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com" <kieran.bingham@...asonboard.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 6/7] platform: x86: Add intel_skl_int3472 driver
On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 02:51:30PM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> 2021. január 18., hétfő 14:51 keltezéssel, Andy Shevchenko írta:
>
> > On Mon, Jan 18, 2021 at 11:12:34AM +0000, Barnabás Pőcze wrote:
> > > 2021. január 18., hétfő 1:34 keltezéssel, Daniel Scally írta:
> >
> > > Have you considered putting the source (and header) files into a dedicated
> > > folder? I think it'd help manageability in the long run, and it'd be immediately
> > > obvious that these source files form a single "unit".
> >
> > What would be the folder name? Because, for example, intel_cht_int33fe* have no
> > folder (yet?) and here it's kinda similar case when HID describes something
> > else than just one IP.
>
> I think "intel_skl_int3472" would not be a bad name for the folder. And I believe
> "intel_cht_int33fe" could be given its own folder as well.
I;m not objecting (at some point in the past I had proposed moving Intel stuff
to a separate folder, but at that time PDx86 has no folders at all and Darren
was kinda not in favour of creating ones, but things changed), just let's hear
Hans on this.
--
With Best Regards,
Andy Shevchenko
Powered by blists - more mailing lists