lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <184ab5eb-2508-0761-36c6-061d509fe104@kernel.org>
Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 14:49:17 -0600
From:   Timur Tabi <timur@...nel.org>
To:     Steven Rostedt <rostedt@...dmis.org>
Cc:     Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Matthew Wilcox <willy@...radead.org>,
        Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky@...il.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        Petr Mladek <pmladek@...e.com>, roman.fietze@...na.com,
        John Ogness <john.ogness@...utronix.de>, linux-mm@...ck.org,
        Akinobu Mita <akinobu.mita@...il.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] introduce DUMP_PREFIX_UNHASHED for hex dumps

On 1/19/21 2:10 PM, Steven Rostedt wrote:
> I'm curious, what is the result if you replaced %p with %pS?
> 
> That way you get a kallsyms offset version of the output, which could still
> be very useful depending on what you are dumping.

	%pS	versatile_init+0x0/0x110

The address is question is often not related to any symbol, so it 
wouldn't make sense to use %pS.

Maybe you meant %pK?  I'm okay with that instead of %px.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ