lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 19 Jan 2021 21:56:49 +0100
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
Cc:     Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
        Leon Romanovsky <leonro@...lanox.com>,
        Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
        Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Andrey Ryabinin <aryabinin@...tuozzo.com>,
        Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] kasan: Add explicit preconditions to kasan_report()

On Tue, Jan 19, 2021 at 9:32 PM Vincenzo Frascino
<vincenzo.frascino@....com> wrote:
>
> This seems not working on arm64 because according to virt_addr_valid 0 is a
> valid virtual address, in fact:
>
> __is_lm_address(0) == true && pfn_valid(virt_to_pfn(0)) == true.
>
> An option could be to make an exception for virtual address 0 in
> addr_has_metadata() something like:
>
> static inline bool addr_has_metadata(const void *addr)
> {
>         if ((u64)addr == 0)
>                 return false;

This sounds good to me, but we need to check for < PAGE_SIZE or
something like that, right? There's some limit below which accesses
are considered null-ptr-derefs.

>         return (is_vmalloc_addr(addr) || virt_addr_valid(addr));

Do we need is_vmalloc_addr()? As we don't yet have vmalloc support for HW_TAGS.

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ