[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20210119211041.GS3666@piout.net>
Date: Tue, 19 Jan 2021 22:10:41 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Cc: mazziesaccount@...il.com, Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>,
Alessandro Zummo <a.zummo@...ertech.it>,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-power@...rohmeurope.com,
linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 16/17] rtc: bd70528: Support RTC on ROHM BD71815
On 19/01/2021 09:31:36+0200, Matti Vaittinen wrote:
> BD71815 contains similar RTC block as BD71828. Only the address offsets
> seem different. Support also BD71815 RTC using rtc-bd70528.
>
> Signed-off-by: Matti Vaittinen <matti.vaittinen@...rohmeurope.com>
Acked-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
> ---
> No changes since v1
>
> drivers/rtc/Kconfig | 6 +++---
> drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c | 45 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++-------
> 2 files changed, 40 insertions(+), 11 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> index 6123f9f4fbc9..1e48424a4729 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/Kconfig
> @@ -501,11 +501,11 @@ config RTC_DRV_M41T80_WDT
> watchdog timer in the ST M41T60 and M41T80 RTC chips series.
>
> config RTC_DRV_BD70528
> - tristate "ROHM BD70528 PMIC RTC"
> - depends on MFD_ROHM_BD70528 && (BD70528_WATCHDOG || !BD70528_WATCHDOG)
> + tristate "ROHM BD70528, BD71815 and BD71828 PMIC RTC"
> + depends on MFD_ROHM_BD71828 || MFD_ROHM_BD70528 && (BD70528_WATCHDOG || !BD70528_WATCHDOG)
> help
> If you say Y here you will get support for the RTC
> - block on ROHM BD70528 and BD71828 Power Management IC.
> + block on ROHM BD70528, BD71815 and BD71828 Power Management IC.
>
> This driver can also be built as a module. If so, the module
> will be called rtc-bd70528.
> diff --git a/drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c b/drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c
> index fb4476bb5ab6..6454afca02a6 100644
> --- a/drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c
> +++ b/drivers/rtc/rtc-bd70528.c
> @@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
>
> #include <linux/bcd.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/rohm-bd70528.h>
> +#include <linux/mfd/rohm-bd71815.h>
> #include <linux/mfd/rohm-bd71828.h>
> #include <linux/module.h>
> #include <linux/of.h>
> @@ -13,6 +14,12 @@
> #include <linux/regmap.h>
> #include <linux/rtc.h>
>
> +/*
> + * On BD71828 and BD71815 the ALM0 MASK is 14 bytes after the ALM0
> + * block start
> + */
> +#define BD718XX_ALM_EN_OFFSET 14
> +
> /*
> * We read regs RTC_SEC => RTC_YEAR
> * this struct is ordered according to chip registers.
> @@ -55,6 +62,7 @@ struct bd70528_rtc {
> struct regmap *regmap;
> struct device *dev;
> u8 reg_time_start;
> + u8 bd718xx_alm_block_start;
> bool has_rtc_timers;
> };
>
> @@ -236,8 +244,8 @@ static int bd71828_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *a)
> struct bd71828_rtc_alm alm;
> struct bd70528_rtc *r = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> - ret = regmap_bulk_read(r->regmap, BD71828_REG_RTC_ALM_START,
> - &alm, sizeof(alm));
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(r->regmap, r->bd718xx_alm_block_start, &alm,
> + sizeof(alm));
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to read alarm regs\n");
> return ret;
> @@ -250,8 +258,8 @@ static int bd71828_set_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *a)
> else
> alm.alm_mask |= BD70528_MASK_ALM_EN;
>
> - ret = regmap_bulk_write(r->regmap, BD71828_REG_RTC_ALM_START,
> - &alm, sizeof(alm));
> + ret = regmap_bulk_write(r->regmap, r->bd718xx_alm_block_start, &alm,
> + sizeof(alm));
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to set alarm time\n");
>
> @@ -311,8 +319,8 @@ static int bd71828_read_alarm(struct device *dev, struct rtc_wkalrm *a)
> struct bd71828_rtc_alm alm;
> struct bd70528_rtc *r = dev_get_drvdata(dev);
>
> - ret = regmap_bulk_read(r->regmap, BD71828_REG_RTC_ALM_START,
> - &alm, sizeof(alm));
> + ret = regmap_bulk_read(r->regmap, r->bd718xx_alm_block_start, &alm,
> + sizeof(alm));
> if (ret) {
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to read alarm regs\n");
> return ret;
> @@ -453,8 +461,9 @@ static int bd71828_alm_enable(struct device *dev, unsigned int enabled)
> if (!enabled)
> enableval = 0;
>
> - ret = regmap_update_bits(r->regmap, BD71828_REG_RTC_ALM0_MASK,
> - BD70528_MASK_ALM_EN, enableval);
> + ret = regmap_update_bits(r->regmap, r->bd718xx_alm_block_start +
> + BD718XX_ALM_EN_OFFSET, BD70528_MASK_ALM_EN,
> + enableval);
> if (ret)
> dev_err(dev, "Failed to change alarm state\n");
>
> @@ -524,9 +533,28 @@ static int bd70528_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> enable_main_irq = true;
> rtc_ops = &bd70528_rtc_ops;
> break;
> + case ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71815:
> + irq_name = "bd71815-rtc-alm-0";
> + bd_rtc->reg_time_start = BD71815_REG_RTC_START;
> +
> + /*
> + * See also BD718XX_ALM_EN_OFFSET:
> + * This works for BD71828 and BD71815 as they have same offset
> + * between ALM0 start and ALM0_MASK. If new ICs are to be
> + * added this requires proper check as ALM0_MASK is not located
> + * at the end of ALM0 block - but after all ALM blocks so if
> + * amount of ALMs differ the offset to enable/disable is likely
> + * to be incorrect and enable/disable must be given as own
> + * reg address here.
> + */
> + bd_rtc->bd718xx_alm_block_start = BD71815_REG_RTC_ALM_START;
> + hour_reg = BD71815_REG_HOUR;
> + rtc_ops = &bd71828_rtc_ops;
> + break;
> case ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71828:
> irq_name = "bd71828-rtc-alm-0";
> bd_rtc->reg_time_start = BD71828_REG_RTC_START;
> + bd_rtc->bd718xx_alm_block_start = BD71828_REG_RTC_ALM_START;
> hour_reg = BD71828_REG_RTC_HOUR;
> rtc_ops = &bd71828_rtc_ops;
> break;
> @@ -605,6 +633,7 @@ static int bd70528_probe(struct platform_device *pdev)
> static const struct platform_device_id bd718x7_rtc_id[] = {
> { "bd70528-rtc", ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD70528 },
> { "bd71828-rtc", ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71828 },
> + { "bd71815-rtc", ROHM_CHIP_TYPE_BD71815 },
> { },
> };
> MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(platform, bd718x7_rtc_id);
> --
> 2.25.4
>
>
> --
> Matti Vaittinen, Linux device drivers
> ROHM Semiconductors, Finland SWDC
> Kiviharjunlenkki 1E
> 90220 OULU
> FINLAND
>
> ~~~ "I don't think so," said Rene Descartes. Just then he vanished ~~~
> Simon says - in Latin please.
> ~~~ "non cogito me" dixit Rene Descarte, deinde evanescavit ~~~
> Thanks to Simon Glass for the translation =]
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists